[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <66b1302ce5fd3_c1448294d3@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2024 13:03:56 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>, Andreas Larsson
<andreas@...sler.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "Arnd
Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Catalin Marinas
<catalin.marinas@....com>, Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Dave Hansen
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, "David
S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>, "Greg
Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Heiko Carstens
<hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar
<mingo@...hat.com>, Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>, "John Paul Adrian
Glaubitz" <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>, Jonathan Cameron
<jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, "Michael
Ellerman" <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, "Palmer
Dabbelt" <palmer@...belt.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, "Rob
Herring" <robh@...nel.org>, Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>,
"Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>, Thomas Gleixner
<tglx@...utronix.de>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>, Will Deacon
<will@...nel.org>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <loongarch@...ts.linux.dev>,
<nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev>, <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/26] x86/numa: use get_pfn_range_for_nid to verify
that node spans memory
Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@...nel.org>
>
> Instead of looping over numa_meminfo array to detect node's start and
> end addresses use get_pfn_range_for_init().
>
> This is shorter and make it easier to lift numa_memblks to generic code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@...nel.org>
> Tested-by: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com> # for x86_64 and arm64
> ---
> arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 13 +++----------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> index edfc38803779..cfe7e5477cf8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> @@ -521,17 +521,10 @@ static int __init numa_register_memblks(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
>
> /* Finally register nodes. */
> for_each_node_mask(nid, node_possible_map) {
> - u64 start = PFN_PHYS(max_pfn);
> - u64 end = 0;
> + unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; i++) {
> - if (nid != mi->blk[i].nid)
> - continue;
> - start = min(mi->blk[i].start, start);
> - end = max(mi->blk[i].end, end);
> - }
> -
> - if (start >= end)
> + get_pfn_range_for_nid(nid, &start_pfn, &end_pfn);
> + if (start_pfn >= end_pfn)
Assuming I understand why this works, would it be worth a comment like:
"Note, get_pfn_range_for_nid() depends on memblock_set_node() having
already happened"
...at least that context was not part of the diff so took me second to
figure out how this works.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists