[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZrE3ijXA3efepKcH@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2024 23:35:22 +0300
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/26] x86/numa: use get_pfn_range_for_nid to verify
that node spans memory
On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 01:03:56PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@...nel.org>
> >
> > Instead of looping over numa_meminfo array to detect node's start and
> > end addresses use get_pfn_range_for_init().
> >
> > This is shorter and make it easier to lift numa_memblks to generic code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@...nel.org>
> > Tested-by: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com> # for x86_64 and arm64
> > ---
> > arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 13 +++----------
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> > index edfc38803779..cfe7e5477cf8 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> > @@ -521,17 +521,10 @@ static int __init numa_register_memblks(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
> >
> > /* Finally register nodes. */
> > for_each_node_mask(nid, node_possible_map) {
> > - u64 start = PFN_PHYS(max_pfn);
> > - u64 end = 0;
> > + unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn;
> >
> > - for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; i++) {
> > - if (nid != mi->blk[i].nid)
> > - continue;
> > - start = min(mi->blk[i].start, start);
> > - end = max(mi->blk[i].end, end);
> > - }
> > -
> > - if (start >= end)
> > + get_pfn_range_for_nid(nid, &start_pfn, &end_pfn);
> > + if (start_pfn >= end_pfn)
>
> Assuming I understand why this works, would it be worth a comment like:
>
> "Note, get_pfn_range_for_nid() depends on memblock_set_node() having
> already happened"
Will add a comment, sure.
> ...at least that context was not part of the diff so took me second to
> figure out how this works.
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists