lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZrE7EWyFJ3hThopM@google.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2024 13:50:25 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] perf annotate: Add --skip-empty option

On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 05:23:51PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 01:14:27PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 04:22:12PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 02:13:32PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > > Like in perf report, we want to hide empty events in the perf annotate
> > > > output.  This is consistent when the option is set in perf report.
> > > > 
> > > > For example, the following command would use 3 events including dummy.
> > > > 
> > > >   $ perf mem record -a -- perf test -w noploop
> > > > 
> > > >   $ perf evlist
> > > >   cpu/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P
> > > >   cpu/mem-stores/P
> > > >   dummy:u
> > > > 
> > > > Just using perf annotate with --group will show the all 3 events.
> > > 
> > > Seems unrelated, just before compiling with this patch:
> > > 
> > > root@x1:~# perf mem record -a -- perf test -w noploop
> > > Memory events are enabled on a subset of CPUs: 4-11
> > > [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> > > [ perf record: Captured and wrote 10.506 MB perf.data (2775 samples) ]
> > > root@x1:~#
> > > 
> > > root@x1:~# perf annotate --group --stdio2 sched_clock
> > > root@x1:~# perf annotate --stdio2 sched_clock
> > > Samples: 178  of event 'cpu_atom/mem-stores/P', 4000 Hz, Event count (approx.): 565268, [percent: local period]
> > > sched_clock() /usr/lib/debug/lib/modules/6.8.11-200.fc39.x86_64/vmlinux
> > > Percent      0xffffffff810511e0 <sched_clock>:
> > >                endbr64        
> > >    5.76        incl    pcpu_hot+0x8
> > >    5.47      → callq   sched_clock_noinstr
> > >   88.78        decl    pcpu_hot+0x8
> > >              ↓ je      1e     
> > >              → jmp     __x86_return_thunk
> > >          1e: → callq   __SCT__preempt_schedule_notrace
> > >              → jmp     __x86_return_thunk
> > > root@x1:~# perf annotate --group --stdio2 sched_clock
> > > root@x1:~# perf annotate --group --stdio sched_clock
> > > root@x1:~# perf annotate --group sched_clock
> > > root@x1:~#
> > > 
> > > root@x1:~# perf evlist
> > > cpu_atom/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P
> > > cpu_atom/mem-stores/P
> > > dummy:u
> > > root@x1:~#
> > > 
> > > root@x1:~# perf report --header-only | grep cmdline
> > > # cmdline : /home/acme/bin/perf mem record -a -- perf test -w noploop 
> > > root@x1:~#
> > > 
> > > I thought it would be some hybrid oddity but seems to be just --group
> > > related, seems like it stops if the first event has no samples? Because
> > > it works with another symbol:
> > 
> > Good catch.  Yeah I found it only checked the first event.  Something
> > like below should fix the issue.
> 
> Nope, with the patch applied:
> 
> root@x1:~# perf annotate --group --stdio sched_clock
> root@x1:~# perf annotate --stdio sched_clock
>  Percent |      Source code & Disassembly of vmlinux for cpu_atom/mem-stores/P (147 samples, percent: local period)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>          : 0                0xffffffff810511e0 <sched_clock>:
>     0.00 :   ffffffff810511e0:       endbr64
>     5.11 :   ffffffff810511e4:       incl    %gs:0x7efe2d5d(%rip)       # 33f48 <pcpu_hot+0x8>
>     0.13 :   ffffffff810511eb:       callq   0xffffffff821350d0
>    94.76 :   ffffffff810511f0:       decl    %gs:0x7efe2d51(%rip)       # 33f48 <pcpu_hot+0x8>
>     0.00 :   ffffffff810511f7:       je      0xffffffff810511fe
>     0.00 :   ffffffff810511f9:       jmp     0xffffffff82153320
>     0.00 :   ffffffff810511fe:       callq   0xffffffff82153990
>     0.00 :   ffffffff81051203:       jmp     0xffffffff82153320
> root@x1:~# perf annotate --group --stdio sched_clock
> root@x1:~# perf annotate --group --stdio2 sched_clock
> root@x1:~# perf annotate --group sched_clock
> root@x1:~#

Oh ok, it was not enough.  It should call evsel__output_resort() after
hists__match() and hists__link().  Use this instead.

Thanks,
Namhyung


diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c b/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
index efcadb7620b8..1bfe41783a7c 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
@@ -632,13 +632,23 @@ static int __cmd_annotate(struct perf_annotate *ann)
 	evlist__for_each_entry(session->evlist, pos) {
 		struct hists *hists = evsel__hists(pos);
 		u32 nr_samples = hists->stats.nr_samples;
+		struct ui_progress prog;
+		struct evsel *evsel;
 
-		if (nr_samples == 0)
+		if (!symbol_conf.event_group || !evsel__is_group_leader(pos))
 			continue;
 
-		if (!symbol_conf.event_group || !evsel__is_group_leader(pos))
+		for_each_group_member(evsel, pos)
+			nr_samples += evsel__hists(evsel)->stats.nr_samples;
+
+		if (nr_samples == 0)
 			continue;
 
+		ui_progress__init(&prog, nr_samples,
+				  "Sorting group events for output...");
+		evsel__output_resort(pos, &prog);
+		ui_progress__finish();
+
 		hists__find_annotations(hists, pos, ann);
 	}
 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ