[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3bea8b7f-b783-ba85-1ed0-c6bd3f6af92b@loongson.cn>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2024 14:37:57 +0800
From: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
Cc: loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] objtool: Handle secondary stack related
instructions
On 08/05/2024 11:26 AM, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> After commit a0f7085f6a63 ("LoongArch: Add RANDOMIZE_KSTACK_OFFSET
> support"), there is a new instruction "sub.d $sp, $sp, $t0" for the
> secondary stack in do_syscall(), then there exists a objtool warning
> "do_syscall+0x11c: return with modified stack frame" and there is no
> handle_syscall() which is the previous frame of do_syscall() in the
> call trace when executing the command "echo l > /proc/sysrq-trigger".
...
> diff --git a/tools/objtool/check.c b/tools/objtool/check.c
> index 01237d167223..c7b9942fee29 100644
> --- a/tools/objtool/check.c
> +++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
> @@ -2993,6 +2993,28 @@ static int update_cfi_state(struct instruction *insn,
> break;
> }
>
> + if (op->dest.reg == CFI_BP && op->src.reg == CFI_SP) {
> + /* addi.d fp,sp,imm for the secondary stack on LoongArch */
> + if (cfa->base == CFI_SP && cfa->offset == op->src.offset) {
> + if (insn->sym->secondary_stack) {
> + cfa->base = CFI_BP;
> + cfa->offset = 0;
> + }
> + }
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (op->dest.reg == CFI_SP && op->src.reg == CFI_BP) {
> + /* addi.d sp,fp,imm for the secondary stack on LoongArch */
> + if (cfa->base == CFI_FP && cfa->offset == 0) {
Here should be CFI_BP instead of CFI_FP which is only defined
for LoongArch.
> + if (insn->sym->secondary_stack) {
> + cfa->base = CFI_SP;
> + cfa->offset = -op->src.offset;
> + }
> + }
> + break;
> + }
> +
> if (op->dest.reg == CFI_SP && op->src.reg == CFI_BP) {
>
> /* lea disp(%rbp), %rsp */
Oh, sorry, I forgot to test this change on x86.
Here is the test info on x86: the cfa->base is CFI_BP
or CFI_BP_INDIRECT and the cfa->offset is not 0
if (op->dest.reg == CFI_SP && op->src.reg == CFI_BP),
thus it can check the following condition
if(cfa->base == CFI_BP && cfa->offset == 0)
to distinguish x86 and LoongArch.
So the correct change should be something like this
to make sure it works well for both x86 and LoongArch:
diff --git a/tools/objtool/check.c b/tools/objtool/check.c
index 01237d167223..0832d20c95d2 100644
--- a/tools/objtool/check.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
@@ -2993,10 +2993,28 @@ static int update_cfi_state(struct instruction
*insn,
break;
}
- if (op->dest.reg == CFI_SP && op->src.reg ==
CFI_BP) {
+ if (op->dest.reg == CFI_BP && op->src.reg ==
CFI_SP) {
+ /* addi.d fp,sp,imm for the secondary
stack on LoongArch */
+ if (cfa->base == CFI_SP && cfa->offset
== op->src.offset) {
+ if (insn->sym->secondary_stack) {
+ cfa->base = CFI_BP;
+ cfa->offset = 0;
+ }
+ }
+ break;
+ }
- /* lea disp(%rbp), %rsp */
- cfi->stack_size = -(op->src.offset +
regs[CFI_BP].offset);
+ if (op->dest.reg == CFI_SP && op->src.reg ==
CFI_BP) {
+ /* addi.d sp,fp,imm for the secondary
stack on LoongArch */
+ if (cfa->base == CFI_BP && cfa->offset
== 0) {
+ if (insn->sym->secondary_stack) {
+ cfa->base = CFI_SP;
+ cfa->offset =
-op->src.offset;
+ }
+ } else {
+ /* lea disp(%rbp), %rsp */
+ cfi->stack_size =
-(op->src.offset + regs[CFI_BP].offset);
+ }
break;
}
I will wait for some days to get more review comments
and then send v3 later.
Thanks,
Tiezhu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists