[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<SN6PR02MB41573831866B7FC9E267D72DD4BE2@SN6PR02MB4157.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2024 03:01:40 +0000
From: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@...look.com>
To: Roman Kisel <romank@...ux.microsoft.com>, "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"decui@...rosoft.com" <decui@...rosoft.com>, "haiyangz@...rosoft.com"
<haiyangz@...rosoft.com>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "kw@...ux.com"
<kw@...ux.com>, "kys@...rosoft.com" <kys@...rosoft.com>, "lenb@...nel.org"
<lenb@...nel.org>, "lpieralisi@...nel.org" <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>, "rafael@...nel.org"
<rafael@...nel.org>, "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>, "wei.liu@...nel.org"
<wei.liu@...nel.org>, "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
CC: "apais@...rosoft.com" <apais@...rosoft.com>, "benhill@...rosoft.com"
<benhill@...rosoft.com>, "ssengar@...rosoft.com" <ssengar@...rosoft.com>,
"sunilmut@...rosoft.com" <sunilmut@...rosoft.com>, "vdso@...bites.dev"
<vdso@...bites.dev>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 1/7] arm64: hyperv: Use SMC to detect hypervisor
presence
From: Roman Kisel <romank@...ux.microsoft.com> Sent: Friday, July 26, 2024 3:59 PM
>
> The arm64 Hyper-V startup path relies on ACPI to detect
> running under a Hyper-V compatible hypervisor. That
> doesn't work on non-ACPI systems.
>
> Hoist the ACPI detection logic into a separate function,
> use the new SMC added recently to Hyper-V to use in the
> non-ACPI case.
Wording seems slightly messed up. Perhaps:
Hoist the ACPI detection logic into a separate function. Then
use the new SMC added recently to Hyper-V in the non-ACPI
case.
Also, the phrase "the new SMC" seems a bit off to me. The "Terms and
Abbreviations" section of the SMCCC specification defines "SMC" as
an instruction:
Secure Monitor Call. An Arm assembler instruction that causes an
exception that is taken synchronously into EL3.
More precisely, I think you mean a SMC "function identifier" that is
newly implemented by Hyper-V. And the function identifier itself isn't
new; it's the Hyper-V implementation that's new.
Similar comment applies in the cover letter for this patch set, and
perhaps to the Subject line of this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roman Kisel <romank@...ux.microsoft.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/hyperv/mshyperv.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> arch/arm64/include/asm/mshyperv.h | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/hyperv/mshyperv.c b/arch/arm64/hyperv/mshyperv.c
> index b1a4de4eee29..341f98312667 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/hyperv/mshyperv.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/hyperv/mshyperv.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,34 @@ int hv_get_hypervisor_version(union hv_hypervisor_version_info *info)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static bool hyperv_detect_via_acpi(void)
> +{
> + if (acpi_disabled)
> + return false;
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI)
> + /* Hypervisor ID is only available in ACPI v6+. */
> + if (acpi_gbl_FADT.header.revision < 6)
> + return false;
> + return strncmp((char *)&acpi_gbl_FADT.hypervisor_id, "MsHyperV", 8) == 0;
> +#else
> + return false;
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> +static bool hyperv_detect_via_smc(void)
> +{
> + struct arm_smccc_res res = {};
> +
> + if (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit() != SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC)
> + return false;
> + arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_CALL_UID_FUNC_ID, &res);
> +
> + return res.a0 == ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_HYPERV_REG_0 &&
> + res.a1 == ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_HYPERV_REG_1 &&
> + res.a2 == ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_HYPERV_REG_2 &&
> + res.a3 == ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_HYPERV_REG_3;
> +}
> +
> static int __init hyperv_init(void)
> {
> struct hv_get_vp_registers_output result;
> @@ -35,13 +63,11 @@ static int __init hyperv_init(void)
>
> /*
> * Allow for a kernel built with CONFIG_HYPERV to be running in
> - * a non-Hyper-V environment, including on DT instead of ACPI.
> + * a non-Hyper-V environment.
> + *
> * In such cases, do nothing and return success.
> */
> - if (acpi_disabled)
> - return 0;
> -
> - if (strncmp((char *)&acpi_gbl_FADT.hypervisor_id, "MsHyperV", 8))
> + if (!hyperv_detect_via_acpi() && !hyperv_detect_via_smc())
> return 0;
>
> /* Setup the guest ID */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mshyperv.h
> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mshyperv.h
> index a975e1a689dd..a7a3586f7cb1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mshyperv.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mshyperv.h
> @@ -51,4 +51,9 @@ static inline u64 hv_get_msr(unsigned int reg)
>
> #include <asm-generic/mshyperv.h>
>
> +#define ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_HYPERV_REG_0 0x7948734d
> +#define ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_HYPERV_REG_1 0x56726570
> +#define ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_HYPERV_REG_2 0
> +#define ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_HYPERV_REG_3 0
> +
Section 6.2 of the SMCCC specification says that the "Call UID Query"
returns a UUID. The above #defines look like an ASCII string is being
returned. Arguably the ASCII string can be treated as a set of 128 bits
just like a UUID, but it doesn't meet the spirit of the spec. Can Hyper-V
be changed to return a real UUID? While the distinction probably
won't make a material difference here, we've had problems in the past
with Hyper-V doing slightly weird things that later caused unexpected
trouble. Please just get it right. :-)
Michael
> #endif
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists