lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZrDt_isszRHkFuLu@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2024 16:21:34 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@...el.com>
Cc: ajones@...tanamicro.com, sunilvl@...tanamicro.com, xiaobo55x@...il.com,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
	"Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: ACPI: NUMA: initialize all values of
 acpi_early_node_map to NUMA_NO_NODE

On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 11:30:24AM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote:
> Currently, only acpi_early_node_map[0] was initialized to NUMA_NO_NODE.
> To ensure all the values were properly initialized, switch to initialize
> all of them to NUMA_NO_NODE.
> 
> Fixes: e18962491696 ("arm64: numa: rework ACPI NUMA initialization")
> Reported-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
> Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
> Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@...tanamicro.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> index 0c036a9a3c33..2465f291c7e1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
>  
>  #include <asm/numa.h>
>  
> -static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { NUMA_NO_NODE };
> +static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { [0 ... NR_CPUS - 1] = NUMA_NO_NODE };

Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>

The patch makes sense but is there any issue currently without it?
Trying to assess whether it needs a stable backport.

-- 
Catalin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ