linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] uapi: enforce non-asm rule for 128-bit bitmasks macros

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZrD7_TZrh0N4Fkx3@yury-ThinkPad>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2024 09:21:17 -0700
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
	l@...y-thinkpad.smtp.subspace.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uapi: enforce non-asm rule for 128-bit bitmasks macros

On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 04:58:25AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 8/3/24 19:07, Yury Norov wrote:
> > The macros wouldn't work in all assembler flavors for reasons described
> > in the comments on top of declarations. Enforce it for more by adding
> > !__ASSEMBLY__ guard.
> 
> Right, this makes sense, should have added in the original patch itself.
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>

Thanks, adding in bitmap-for-next.

Thanks,
Yury