[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZrEAKxktYXFyxWXy@hu-bjorande-lv.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2024 09:39:07 -0700
From: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
CC: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <quic_krichai@...cinc.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi
<lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski
<kw@...ux.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas
<bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
<cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam
<manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
<andersson@...nel.org>, <quic_vbadigan@...cinc.com>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski
<bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] dt-bindings: PCI: Add binding for qps615
On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 07:12:34AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 05/08/2024 06:02, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 8/4/2024 2:26 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 03/08/2024 05:22, Krishna chaitanya chundru wrote:
> >>> Add binding describing the Qualcomm PCIe switch, QPS615,
> >>> which provides Ethernet MAC integrated to the 3rd downstream port
> >>> and two downstream PCIe ports.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Krishna chaitanya chundru <quic_krichai@...cinc.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> .../devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,qps615.yaml | 191 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> 1 file changed, 191 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,qps615.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,qps615.yaml
> >>> new file mode 100644
> >>> index 000000000000..ea0c953ee56f
> >>> --- /dev/null
> >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,qps615.yaml
> >>> @@ -0,0 +1,191 @@
> >>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> >>> +%YAML 1.2
> >>> +---
> >>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pci/qcom,qps615.yaml#
> >>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> >>> +
> >>> +title: Qualcomm QPS615 PCIe switch
> >>> +
> >>> +maintainers:
> >>> + - Krishna chaitanya chundru <quic_krichai@...cinc.com>
> >>> +
> >>> +description: |
> >>> + Qualcomm QPS615 PCIe switch has one upstream and three downstream
> >>> + ports. The 3rd downstream port has integrated endpoint device of
> >>> + Ethernet MAC. Other two downstream ports are supposed to connect
> >>> + to external device.
> >>> +
> >>> + The QPS615 PCIe switch can be configured through I2C interface before
> >>> + PCIe link is established to change FTS, ASPM related entry delays,
> >>> + tx amplitude etc for better power efficiency and functionality.
> >>> +
> >>> +properties:
> >>> + compatible:
> >>> + enum:
> >>> + - pci1179,0623
> >>> +
> >>> + reg:
> >>> + maxItems: 1
> >>> +
> >>> + qcom,qps615-controller:
> >>
> >> and now I see that you totally ignored comments. Repeating the same over
> >> and over is a waste of time.
> >>
> >> <form letter>
> >> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
> >>
> >> It seems my or other reviewer's previous comments were not fully
> >> addressed. Maybe the feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you
> >> just forgot to apply it. Please go back to the previous discussion and
> >> either implement all requested changes or keep discussing them.
> >>
> >> Thank you.
Well, thank you for the rant. Very helpful indeed.
> >> </form letter>
> >>
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Krzysztof
> >>
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > In patch1 we are trying to add reference of i2c-adapter, you suggested
> > to use i2c-bus for that. we got comments on the driver code not to use
> > adapter and instead use i2c client reference. I felt i2c-bus is not
> > ideal to represent i2c client device so used this name.
>
> You did not respond to comment of using i2c-bus, just silently decided
> to implement other property.
>
I guess you totally ignored my comment when you reviewed the previous
version, where I asked him to represent the device on said bus.
> Anyway, why i2c-bus is not suitable here? I am quite surprised...
>
I was not aware that i2c-bus was an acceptable solution, sorry for my
bad suggestion and guidance here.
Regards,
Bjorn
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists