[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72mc5h1vx+YoX_MxpFcgDEOfuYJNT9986wTjc3oSbVsbVg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 23:14:01 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>
Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, ojeda@...nel.org, alex.gaynor@...il.com,
wedsonaf@...il.com, boqun.feng@...il.com, gary@...yguo.net,
benno.lossin@...ton.me, a.hindborg@...sung.com, aliceryhl@...gle.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, daniel.almeida@...labora.com,
faith.ekstrand@...labora.com, boris.brezillon@...labora.com,
lina@...hilina.net, mcanal@...lia.com, zhiw@...dia.com, acurrid@...dia.com,
cjia@...dia.com, jhubbard@...dia.com, airlied@...hat.com, ajanulgu@...hat.com,
lyude@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 21/28] rust: alloc: remove `GlobalAlloc` and `krealloc_aligned`
On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 9:07 PM Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com> wrote:
>
> This can be removed too. liballoc needed it for us to acknowledge that we
> were linking liballoc in a way that isn't guaranteed to be stable, but now
> that we are removing liballoc entirely, this static is no longer necessary.
Thanks Björn, noted in issue #2 (and linked to the new tracking issue).
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists