[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ed9feaa-b7dc-4a02-a58d-ee845e872bd2@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 23:02:38 +0100
From: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@...il.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, hannes@...xchg.org,
shakeel.butt@...ux.dev, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, yuzhao@...gle.com,
david@...hat.com, baohua@...nel.org, ryan.roberts@....com, rppt@...nel.org,
willy@...radead.org, cerasuolodomenico@...il.com, corbet@....net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...a.com, Alexander Zhu <alexlzhu@...com>, riel@...riel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] mm: add selftests to split_huge_page() to verify
unmap/zap of zero pages
On 01/08/2024 05:45, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Usama,
>
> kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
>
> [auto build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-everything]
>
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Usama-Arif/Revert-memcg-remove-mem_cgroup_uncharge_list/20240730-223949
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything
> patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240730125346.1580150-6-usamaarif642%40gmail.com
> patch subject: [PATCH 5/6] mm: add selftests to split_huge_page() to verify unmap/zap of zero pages
> :::::: branch date: 32 hours ago
> :::::: commit date: 32 hours ago
> compiler: gcc-13 (Ubuntu 13.2.0-4ubuntu3) 13.2.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240801/202408010618.lgnamdZd-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202408010618.lgnamdZd-lkp@intel.com/
>
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> vm_util.c: In function 'rss_anon':
>>> vm_util.c:188:41: warning: format '%ld' expects argument of type 'long int *', but argument 3 has type 'uint64_t *' {aka 'long long unsigned int *'} [-Wformat=]
> 188 | if (sscanf(buffer, "RssAnon:%10ld kB", &rss_anon) != 1)
> | ~~~~^ ~~~~~~~~~
> | | |
> | | uint64_t * {aka long long unsigned int *}
> | long int *
> | %10lld
>
>
Interesting affect of different compilers!
If I compile with the above suggestion on my machine, i.e. convert ld to lld, I get a warning on my machine that uint64_t is long unsigned int (and not long long unsigned int as above):
vm_util.c: In function ‘rss_anon’:
vm_util.c:188:42: warning: format ‘%lld’ expects argument of type ‘long long int *’, but argument 3 has type ‘uint64_t *’ {aka ‘long unsigned int *’} [-Wformat=]
188 | if (sscanf(buffer, "RssAnon:%10lld kB", &rss_anon) != 1)
| ~~~~~^ ~~~~~~~~~
| | |
| | uint64_t * {aka long unsigned int *}
| long long int *
| %10ld
I will just do below which should work hopefully with all compilers:
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c
index 7b7e763ba8e3..bd147bdb1bb2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c
@@ -172,9 +172,9 @@ uint64_t read_pmd_pagesize(void)
return strtoul(buf, NULL, 10);
}
-uint64_t rss_anon(void)
+long unsigned rss_anon(void)
{
- uint64_t rss_anon = 0;
+ long unsigned rss_anon = 0;
FILE *fp;
char buffer[MAX_LINE_LENGTH];
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ uint64_t rss_anon(void)
if (!check_for_pattern(fp, "RssAnon:", buffer, sizeof(buffer)))
goto err_out;
- if (sscanf(buffer, "RssAnon:%10ld kB", &rss_anon) != 1)
+ if (sscanf(buffer, "RssAnon:%10lu kB", &rss_anon) != 1)
ksft_exit_fail_msg("Reading status error\n");
err_out:
Powered by blists - more mailing lists