[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240806232649.3258741-1-axelrasmussen@google.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 16:26:49 -0700
From: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm, slub: print CPU id on slab OOM
Depending on how remote_node_defrag_ratio is configured, allocations can
end up in this path as a result of the local node being OOM, despite the
allocation overall being unconstrained (node == -1).
When we print a warning, printing the current CPU makes that situation
more clear (i.e., you can immediately see which node's OOM status
matters for the allocation at hand).
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>
---
mm/slub.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index c9d8a2497fd6..7148047998de 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -3422,7 +3422,8 @@ slab_out_of_memory(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, int nid)
if ((gfpflags & __GFP_NOWARN) || !__ratelimit(&slub_oom_rs))
return;
- pr_warn("SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node %d, gfp=%#x(%pGg)\n",
+ pr_warn("SLUB: Unable to allocate memory for CPU %u on node %d, gfp=%#x(%pGg)\n",
+ preemptible() ? raw_smp_processor_id() : smp_processor_id(),
nid, gfpflags, &gfpflags);
pr_warn(" cache: %s, object size: %u, buffer size: %u, default order: %u, min order: %u\n",
s->name, s->object_size, s->size, oo_order(s->oo),
--
2.46.0.rc2.264.g509ed76dc8-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists