linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: ti, sci: Add property for partial-io-wakeup-sources

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f0f60af7-8561-433a-a027-811015fc5e16@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 08:18:01 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
 Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>, Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
Cc: Vibhore Vardhan <vibhore@...com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
 Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: ti, sci: Add property for
 partial-io-wakeup-sources

On 29/07/2024 10:00, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote:
> Partial-IO is a very low power mode in which nearly everything is
> powered off. Only pins of a few hardware units are kept sensitive and
> are capable to wakeup the SoC. The device nodes are marked as
> 'wakeup-source' but so are a lot of other device nodes as well that are
> not able to do a wakeup from Partial-IO. This creates the need to
> describe the device nodes that are capable of wakeup from Partial-IO.
> 
> This patch adds a property with a list of these nodes defining which
> devices can be used as wakeup sources in Partial-IO.
> 

<form letter>
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It seems my or other reviewer's previous comments were not fully
addressed. Maybe the feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you
just forgot to apply it. Please go back to the previous discussion and
either implement all requested changes or keep discussing them.

Thank you.
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof