[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25163642-8f36-4bb1-8bf4-a3e34b283795@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 12:41:39 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: "Agarwal, Utsav" <Utsav.Agarwal@...log.com>,
"Hennerich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, "Sa, Nuno" <Nuno.Sa@...log.com>
Cc: "linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Artamonovs, Arturs" <Arturs.Artamonovs@...log.com>,
"Bimpikas, Vasileios" <Vasileios.Bimpikas@...log.com>,
"Gaskell, Oliver" <Oliver.Gaskell@...log.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/3] adp5588-keys: Support for dedicated gpio operation
On 06/08/2024 12:16, Agarwal, Utsav wrote:
>>
>>
>>> - Added dt-binding dependency for interrupt-controller. Now if
>>> interrupt-controller is specified, interrupts must be
>>> provided.
>>
>> So that's the reason of skipping tag?
>
> Apologies if I don’t understand this, but I have pointed to the link
> for the previous version as well as labelled that this change is
> under v9. I understand the order is wrong, but all versions seem to
> be present in the changelog. Could you guide me on what should
> to be added?
You received a tag (or even tags). Where is it?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists