linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] ALSA: Add support for new HP G12 laptops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <554660e1-01ea-4bb4-877f-fd8deb527ce7@opensource.cirrus.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 12:06:25 +0100
From: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        "Wolfram
 Sang" <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
CC: <tiwai@...e.com>, <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        <linux-sound@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <patches@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] ALSA: Add support for new HP G12 laptops

On 5/8/24 09:02, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Aug 2024 17:22:12 +0200,
> Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
>>
>> Add support for HP G12 laptops that use CS35L54 or CS35L56 amplifiers
>> with Realtek HDA codecs. Some of these use the same SSID for models with
>> CS35L54 and models with CS35L56 so the ACPI entries are examined to
>> determine which amp is present.
>>
>> To avoid having to #ifdef around this code we've fixed the definitions
>> of SPI and I2C functions that were not correctly supplying dummy functions
>> when the real functions are not in the build.
>>
>> Changes since V1:
>> Added I2C and SPI patches to provide dummy functions.
>>
>> Richard Fitzgerald (2):
>>    spi: Add empty versions of ACPI functions
>>    i2c: Fix conditional for substituting empty ACPI functions
>>
>> Simon Trimmer (1):
>>    ALSA: hda/realtek: Add support for new HP G12 laptops
> 
> Hm, the 3rd patch requires both patch 1 and 2, and now those seem to
> have been applied to two different trees, which makes hard to apply
> the 3rd one.
> 
> Mark, Wolfram, will you guys submit PR for 6.11-rc3 including the
> patch 1 and 2?  If so, I can apply the patch 3 later on top of
> 6.11-rc3.
> 
> Or, I'd need to pull from both of you and apply the patch 3.
> 
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Takashi

We've just noticed that the SPI patches have gone into for-6.12.
We really hoped that we could get the main patch (G12 support) into
6.11 (yes, I know, I didn't actually say that we were targeting 6.11 -
sorry).