[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<SJ0PR03MB63437EFA57B2A135335983529BBF2@SJ0PR03MB6343.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 11:29:15 +0000
From: "Agarwal, Utsav" <Utsav.Agarwal@...log.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
"Hennerich, Michael"
<Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, "Sa, Nuno" <Nuno.Sa@...log.com>
CC: "linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Artamonovs,
Arturs" <Arturs.Artamonovs@...log.com>,
"Bimpikas, Vasileios"
<Vasileios.Bimpikas@...log.com>,
"Gaskell, Oliver"
<Oliver.Gaskell@...log.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v9 0/3] adp5588-keys: Support for dedicated gpio operation
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2024 11:42 AM
> To: Agarwal, Utsav <Utsav.Agarwal@...log.com>; Hennerich, Michael
> <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>; Dmitry Torokhov
> <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>; Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>; Krzysztof
> Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>; Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>; Sa,
> Nuno <Nuno.Sa@...log.com>
> Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; Artamonovs, Arturs
> <Arturs.Artamonovs@...log.com>; Bimpikas, Vasileios
> <Vasileios.Bimpikas@...log.com>; Gaskell, Oliver
> <Oliver.Gaskell@...log.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/3] adp5588-keys: Support for dedicated gpio
> operation
>
> [External]
>
> On 06/08/2024 12:16, Agarwal, Utsav wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> - Added dt-binding dependency for interrupt-controller. Now if
> >>> interrupt-controller is specified, interrupts must be
> >>> provided.
> >>
> >> So that's the reason of skipping tag?
> >
> > Apologies if I don’t understand this, but I have pointed to the link
> > for the previous version as well as labelled that this change is
> > under v9. I understand the order is wrong, but all versions seem to
> > be present in the changelog. Could you guide me on what should
> > to be added?
>
> You received a tag (or even tags). Where is it?
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Ah I see. Thank you for pointing that to me. I will add them.
- Utsav
Powered by blists - more mailing lists