[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3c0fcf0b-8dfe-4a6a-b4a5-4c4732ae52e5@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 15:10:12 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Davidlohr Bueso
<dave@...olabs.net>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki"
<rafael@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/26] x86/numa: use get_pfn_range_for_nid to verify
that node spans memory
On 01.08.24 08:08, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@...nel.org>
>
> Instead of looping over numa_meminfo array to detect node's start and
> end addresses use get_pfn_range_for_init().
>
> This is shorter and make it easier to lift numa_memblks to generic code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@...nel.org>
> Tested-by: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com> # for x86_64 and arm64
> ---
> arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 13 +++----------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> index edfc38803779..cfe7e5477cf8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> @@ -521,17 +521,10 @@ static int __init numa_register_memblks(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
>
> /* Finally register nodes. */
> for_each_node_mask(nid, node_possible_map) {
> - u64 start = PFN_PHYS(max_pfn);
> - u64 end = 0;
> + unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; i++) {
> - if (nid != mi->blk[i].nid)
> - continue;
> - start = min(mi->blk[i].start, start);
> - end = max(mi->blk[i].end, end);
> - }
> -
> - if (start >= end)
> + get_pfn_range_for_nid(nid, &start_pfn, &end_pfn);
> + if (start_pfn >= end_pfn)
> continue;
>
> alloc_node_data(nid);
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists