linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] perf: Per PMU context reschedule and misc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2a32a538-b86c-40ec-8b85-17f793c0bfac@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 11:19:22 -0400
From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, mingo@...nel.org
Cc: acme@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
 alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org, irogers@...gle.com,
 adrian.hunter@...el.com, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] perf: Per PMU context reschedule and misc



On 2024-08-07 7:29 a.m., Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This is 'fallout' from Namhyung posting his per-pmu ctx_resched() patches. It
> started with me trying to clean up and get rid of corner cases, and then got
> involved when Kan noted the time keeping issue.
> 
> Anyway, please review / test.
> 

Except for the tiny nit, the patch series looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>

Thanks,
Kan