[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202408080114.hpttUZjC-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 01:31:54 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>, peterz@...radead.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
vschneid@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Menglong Dong <dongml2@...natelecom.cn>,
Bin Lai <laib2@...natelecom.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] sched: make printk safe when rq lock is held
Hi Menglong,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on next-20240806]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Menglong-Dong/sched-make-printk-safe-when-rq-lock-is-held/20240806-155153
base: next-20240806
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240806074131.36007-1-dongml2%40chinatelecom.cn
patch subject: [PATCH next] sched: make printk safe when rq lock is held
config: openrisc-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240808/202408080114.hpttUZjC-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: or1k-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240808/202408080114.hpttUZjC-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202408080114.hpttUZjC-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from kernel/sched/core.c:88:
kernel/sched/sched.h: In function 'rq_pin_lock':
>> kernel/sched/sched.h:1705:9: error: implicit declaration of function '__printk_safe_enter'; did you mean '__printk_deferred_enter'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
1705 | __printk_safe_enter();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| __printk_deferred_enter
kernel/sched/sched.h: In function 'rq_unpin_lock':
>> kernel/sched/sched.h:1722:9: error: implicit declaration of function '__printk_safe_exit'; did you mean '__printk_ratelimit'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
1722 | __printk_safe_exit();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| __printk_ratelimit
vim +1705 kernel/sched/sched.h
1690
1691 /*
1692 * Lockdep annotation that avoids accidental unlocks; it's like a
1693 * sticky/continuous lockdep_assert_held().
1694 *
1695 * This avoids code that has access to 'struct rq *rq' (basically everything in
1696 * the scheduler) from accidentally unlocking the rq if they do not also have a
1697 * copy of the (on-stack) 'struct rq_flags rf'.
1698 *
1699 * Also see Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.rst.
1700 */
1701 static inline void rq_pin_lock(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
1702 {
1703 rf->cookie = lockdep_pin_lock(__rq_lockp(rq));
1704
> 1705 __printk_safe_enter();
1706 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG
1707 rq->clock_update_flags &= (RQCF_REQ_SKIP|RQCF_ACT_SKIP);
1708 rf->clock_update_flags = 0;
1709 # ifdef CONFIG_SMP
1710 SCHED_WARN_ON(rq->balance_callback && rq->balance_callback != &balance_push_callback);
1711 # endif
1712 #endif
1713 }
1714
1715 static inline void rq_unpin_lock(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
1716 {
1717 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG
1718 if (rq->clock_update_flags > RQCF_ACT_SKIP)
1719 rf->clock_update_flags = RQCF_UPDATED;
1720 #endif
1721
> 1722 __printk_safe_exit();
1723 lockdep_unpin_lock(__rq_lockp(rq), rf->cookie);
1724 }
1725
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists