[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZrPafx6KUuhZZsci@eldamar.lan>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 22:35:11 +0200
From: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
Akemi Yagi <toracat@...epo.org>,
Hardik Garg <hargar@...ux.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/86] 6.1.104-rc1 review
Hi Greg,
On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 04:59:39PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.104 release.
> There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 09 Aug 2024 15:00:24 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
6.1.103 had the regression of bpftool not building, due to a missing
backport:
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/v8lqgl$15bq$1@ciao.gmane.io/
The problem is that da5f8fd1f0d3 ("bpftool: Mount bpffs when pinmaps
path not under the bpffs") was backported to 6.1.103 but there is no
defintion of create_and_mount_bpffs_dir().
it was suggested to revert the commit completely.
Regards,
Salvatore
Powered by blists - more mailing lists