[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240807151352.3d66afe8@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 15:13:52 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Sunil V L <sunilvl@...tanamicro.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, Greg
Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Jiri Slaby
<jirislaby@...nel.org>, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: 8250_platform: Fix structure initialization
warning
Hi Sunil,
On Wed, 7 Aug 2024 09:52:10 +0530 Sunil V L <sunilvl@...tanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_platform.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_platform.c
> index bdfb16bed4f2..d8c3c169a620 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_platform.c
> @@ -108,11 +108,12 @@ void __init serial8250_isa_init_ports(void)
> static int serial8250_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> - struct uart_8250_port uart = { 0 };
> + struct uart_8250_port uart;
Does just using "{ }" as an initialiser work without warning?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists