lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8a910e2f-aaf2-40cd-8131-a1a2531a12c8@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 11:03:29 +0530
From: Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@...com>
To: Manorit Chawdhry <m-chawdhry@...com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
CC: Andrew Davis <afd@...com>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        Tero
 Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof
 Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Aniket Limaye <a-limaye@...com>,
        Udit Kumar
	<u-kumar1@...com>, Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@...com>,
        Siddharth Vadapalli
	<s-vadapalli@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721s2*: Add bootph-*
 properties

Hi Manorit

On 07/08/24 10:56, Manorit Chawdhry wrote:
> Hi Nishanth,
> 
> On 10:07-20240806, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> On 09:43-20240806, Andrew Davis wrote:
>>> On 7/30/24 4:53 AM, Manorit Chawdhry wrote:
>>>> Adds bootph-* properties to the leaf nodes to enable U-boot to
>>>> utilise them.
>>>
>>> U-Boot? Let's try to pretend like this is a generic property and
>>> just say "bootloader" :)
>>>> @@ -445,6 +446,7 @@ flash@0 {
>>>>    		cdns,tchsh-ns = <60>;
>>>>    		cdns,tslch-ns = <60>;
>>>>    		cdns,read-delay = <4>;
>>>> +		bootph-all;
>>
>> Here and elsewhere, follow:
>> 	https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dts-coding-style.rst#n117
> 
> Could you tell me what are you seeing wrong? The dts-coding-style that
> you shared doesn't tell a specific location for bootph-* properties so
> using the generic reasoning.
> 
> "1. Most important properties start the node: compatible then bus addressing to
>     match unit address."
> 
> This is the least important property considering Linux and hence the
> reasoning was that it should come in the last. Also, j722s and am62p
> follow the same convention so it was taken from there only.
> 

Not sure if this is what he meant, but bootph-* comes under standard/common 
properties as per my understanding of the coding style. And status needs to be 
at the very end if it's there (in this case it's not but just mentioning).

> Regards,
> Manorit
> 
>>
>>
>>>>    	};
>>>>    };
>>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Regards,
>> Nishanth Menon
>> Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D

-- 
Thanking You
Neha Malcom Francis

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ