[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ttfwiyn6.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2024 10:24:13 +0300
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To: Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, hhorace <hhoracehsu@...il.com>,
johannes@...solutions.net, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Ido Schimmel
<idosch@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: cfg80211: fix bug of mapping AF3x to incorrect
User Priority
Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 10:08:44AM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
>> + Guillaume and Ido
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 03:17:42PM +0800, hhorace wrote:
>> > According to RFC8325 4.3, Multimedia Streaming: AF31(011010, 26),
>> > AF32(011100, 28), AF33(011110, 30) maps to User Priority = 4
>> > and AC_VI (Video).
>> >
>> > However, the original code remain the default three Most Significant
>> > Bits (MSBs) of the DSCP, which makes AF3x map to User Priority = 3
>> > and AC_BE (Best Effort).
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: hhorace <hhoracehsu@...il.com>
>>
>> Adding Guillaume and Ido as this relates to DSCP.
>
> Thanks. The patch looks good to me (only missing a Fixes tag).
>
> Just a note to hhorace: the entry for CS5 (case 40) is useless as CS5
> is 101000. So the value of the 3 high order bits already is 5 (in case
> you want to make a followup patch for net-next).
Minor clarification: cfg80211 patches go to wireless-next, not net-next.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists