linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-brauner tree with the vfs-fixes tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240807100433.16e92156@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 10:04:33 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Al Viro
 <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next
 Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-brauner tree with the vfs-fixes
 tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the vfs-brauner tree got a conflict in:

  tools/testing/selftests/core/close_range_test.c

between commit:

  9a2fa1472083 ("fix bitmap corruption on close_range() with CLOSE_RANGE_UNSHARE")

from the vfs-fixes tree and commit:

  b7fcee976159 ("selftests: add F_CREATED_QUERY tests")

from the vfs-brauner tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc tools/testing/selftests/core/close_range_test.c
index 12b4eb9d0434,3e829666281d..000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/core/close_range_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/core/close_range_test.c
@@@ -589,39 -593,39 +593,74 @@@ TEST(close_range_cloexec_unshare_syzbot
  	EXPECT_EQ(close(fd3), 0);
  }
  
 +TEST(close_range_bitmap_corruption)
 +{
 +	pid_t pid;
 +	int status;
 +	struct __clone_args args = {
 +		.flags = CLONE_FILES,
 +		.exit_signal = SIGCHLD,
 +	};
 +
 +	/* get the first 128 descriptors open */
 +	for (int i = 2; i < 128; i++)
 +		EXPECT_GE(dup2(0, i), 0);
 +
 +	/* get descriptor table shared */
 +	pid = sys_clone3(&args, sizeof(args));
 +	ASSERT_GE(pid, 0);
 +
 +	if (pid == 0) {
 +		/* unshare and truncate descriptor table down to 64 */
 +		if (sys_close_range(64, ~0U, CLOSE_RANGE_UNSHARE))
 +			exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
 +
 +		ASSERT_EQ(fcntl(64, F_GETFD), -1);
 +		/* ... and verify that the range 64..127 is not
 +		   stuck "fully used" according to secondary bitmap */
 +		EXPECT_EQ(dup(0), 64)
 +			exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
 +		exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
 +	}
 +
 +	EXPECT_EQ(waitpid(pid, &status, 0), pid);
 +	EXPECT_EQ(true, WIFEXITED(status));
 +	EXPECT_EQ(0, WEXITSTATUS(status));
 +}
 +
+ TEST(fcntl_created)
+ {
+ 	for (int i = 0; i < 101; i++) {
+ 		int fd;
+ 		char path[PATH_MAX];
+ 
+ 		fd = open("/dev/null", O_RDONLY | O_CLOEXEC);
+ 		ASSERT_GE(fd, 0) {
+ 			if (errno == ENOENT)
+ 				SKIP(return,
+ 					   "Skipping test since /dev/null does not exist");
+ 		}
+ 
+ 		/* We didn't create "/dev/null". */
+ 		EXPECT_EQ(fcntl(fd, F_CREATED_QUERY, 0), 0);
+ 		close(fd);
+ 
+ 		sprintf(path, "aaaa_%d", i);
+ 		fd = open(path, O_CREAT | O_RDONLY | O_CLOEXEC, 0600);
+ 		ASSERT_GE(fd, 0);
+ 
+ 		/* We created "aaaa_%d". */
+ 		EXPECT_EQ(fcntl(fd, F_CREATED_QUERY, 0), 1);
+ 		close(fd);
+ 
+ 		fd = open(path, O_RDONLY | O_CLOEXEC);
+ 		ASSERT_GE(fd, 0);
+ 
+ 		/* We're opening it again, so no positive creation check. */
+ 		EXPECT_EQ(fcntl(fd, F_CREATED_QUERY, 0), 0);
+ 		close(fd);
+ 		unlink(path);
+ 	}
+ }
+ 
  TEST_HARNESS_MAIN

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped