[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240807085919.92798-1-takakura@valinux.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 17:59:19 +0900
From: takakura@...inux.co.jp
To: pmladek@...e.com,
john.ogness@...utronix.de
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
bhe@...hat.com,
feng.tang@...el.com,
j.granados@...sung.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lukas@...ner.de,
nishimura@...inux.co.jp,
rostedt@...dmis.org,
senozhatsky@...omium.org,
stephen.s.brennan@...cle.com,
taka@...inux.co.jp,
takakura@...inux.co.jp,
ubizjak@...il.com,
wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Handle flushing of CPU backtraces during panic
Hi John and Petr,
On 2024-08-05, John Ogness wrote:
>On 2024-08-03, takakura@...inux.co.jp wrote:
>> From: Ryo Takakura <takakura@...inux.co.jp>
>>
>> After panic, non-panicked CPU's has been unable to flush ringbuffer
>> while they can still write into it. This can affect CPU backtrace
>> triggered in panic only able to write into ringbuffer incapable of
>> flushing them.
>
>Right now, they cannot write to it. If you apply your second patch
>before this one, then the above statement is true.
>
>Perhaps the ordering of the two patches should be reversed?
Yes, that is true. Thanks!
I'll send the patches in the reverse order for next version.
>Either way, for the series:
>
>Reviewed-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
Sincerely,
Ryo Takakura
Powered by blists - more mailing lists