lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240807085919.92798-1-takakura@valinux.co.jp>
Date: Wed,  7 Aug 2024 17:59:19 +0900
From: takakura@...inux.co.jp
To: pmladek@...e.com,
	john.ogness@...utronix.de
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	bhe@...hat.com,
	feng.tang@...el.com,
	j.granados@...sung.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	lukas@...ner.de,
	nishimura@...inux.co.jp,
	rostedt@...dmis.org,
	senozhatsky@...omium.org,
	stephen.s.brennan@...cle.com,
	taka@...inux.co.jp,
	takakura@...inux.co.jp,
	ubizjak@...il.com,
	wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Handle flushing of CPU backtraces during panic

Hi John and Petr,

On 2024-08-05, John Ogness wrote:
>On 2024-08-03, takakura@...inux.co.jp wrote:
>> From: Ryo Takakura <takakura@...inux.co.jp>
>>
>> After panic, non-panicked CPU's has been unable to flush ringbuffer 
>> while they can still write into it. This can affect CPU backtrace 
>> triggered in panic only able to write into ringbuffer incapable of 
>> flushing them.
>
>Right now, they cannot write to it. If you apply your second patch
>before this one, then the above statement is true.
>
>Perhaps the ordering of the two patches should be reversed?

Yes, that is true. Thanks!
I'll send the patches in the reverse order for next version. 

>Either way, for the series:
>
>Reviewed-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>

Sincerely,
Ryo Takakura

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ