[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240807105954.088fcb2d@p-imbrenda.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 10:59:54 +0200
From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
Jonathan Corbet
<corbet@....net>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev
<agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Gerald
Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 09/11] s390/mm/fault: convert
do_secure_storage_access() from follow_page() to folio_walk
On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 17:55:22 +0200
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
> Let's get rid of another follow_page() user and perform the conversion
> under PTL: Note that this is also what follow_page_pte() ends up doing.
>
> Unfortunately we cannot currently optimize out the additional reference,
> because arch_make_folio_accessible() must be called with a raised
> refcount to protect against concurrent conversion to secure. We can just
> move the arch_make_folio_accessible() under the PTL, like
> follow_page_pte() would.
>
> We'll effectively drop the "writable" check implied by FOLL_WRITE:
> follow_page_pte() would also not check that when calling
> arch_make_folio_accessible(), so there is no good reason for doing that
> here.
>
> We'll lose the secretmem check from follow_page() as well, about which
> we shouldn't really care about.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/mm/fault.c | 16 ++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
> index 8e149ef5e89b..ad8b0d6b77ea 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> #include <linux/hugetlb.h>
> #include <linux/kfence.h>
> +#include <linux/pagewalk.h>
> #include <asm/asm-extable.h>
> #include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
> #include <asm/ptrace.h>
> @@ -492,9 +493,9 @@ void do_secure_storage_access(struct pt_regs *regs)
> union teid teid = { .val = regs->int_parm_long };
> unsigned long addr = get_fault_address(regs);
> struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> + struct folio_walk fw;
> struct mm_struct *mm;
> struct folio *folio;
> - struct page *page;
> struct gmap *gmap;
> int rc;
>
> @@ -536,15 +537,18 @@ void do_secure_storage_access(struct pt_regs *regs)
> vma = find_vma(mm, addr);
> if (!vma)
> return handle_fault_error(regs, SEGV_MAPERR);
> - page = follow_page(vma, addr, FOLL_WRITE | FOLL_GET);
> - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(page)) {
> + folio = folio_walk_start(&fw, vma, addr, 0);
> + if (!folio) {
> mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> break;
> }
> - folio = page_folio(page);
> - if (arch_make_folio_accessible(folio))
> - send_sig(SIGSEGV, current, 0);
> + /* arch_make_folio_accessible() needs a raised refcount. */
> + folio_get(folio);
> + rc = arch_make_folio_accessible(folio);
> folio_put(folio);
> + folio_walk_end(&fw, vma);
> + if (rc)
> + send_sig(SIGSEGV, current, 0);
> mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> break;
> case KERNEL_FAULT:
Powered by blists - more mailing lists