lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240807105954.088fcb2d@p-imbrenda.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 10:59:54 +0200
From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet
 <corbet@....net>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Alexander Gordeev
 <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Gerald
 Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 09/11] s390/mm/fault: convert
 do_secure_storage_access() from follow_page() to folio_walk

On Fri,  2 Aug 2024 17:55:22 +0200
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:

> Let's get rid of another follow_page() user and perform the conversion
> under PTL: Note that this is also what follow_page_pte() ends up doing.
> 
> Unfortunately we cannot currently optimize out the additional reference,
> because arch_make_folio_accessible() must be called with a raised
> refcount to protect against concurrent conversion to secure. We can just
> move the arch_make_folio_accessible() under the PTL, like
> follow_page_pte() would.
> 
> We'll effectively drop the "writable" check implied by FOLL_WRITE:
> follow_page_pte() would also not check that when calling
> arch_make_folio_accessible(), so there is no good reason for doing that
> here.
> 
> We'll lose the secretmem check from follow_page() as well, about which
> we shouldn't really care about.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>

Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>

> ---
>  arch/s390/mm/fault.c | 16 ++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
> index 8e149ef5e89b..ad8b0d6b77ea 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>  #include <linux/hugetlb.h>
>  #include <linux/kfence.h>
> +#include <linux/pagewalk.h>
>  #include <asm/asm-extable.h>
>  #include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
>  #include <asm/ptrace.h>
> @@ -492,9 +493,9 @@ void do_secure_storage_access(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  	union teid teid = { .val = regs->int_parm_long };
>  	unsigned long addr = get_fault_address(regs);
>  	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> +	struct folio_walk fw;
>  	struct mm_struct *mm;
>  	struct folio *folio;
> -	struct page *page;
>  	struct gmap *gmap;
>  	int rc;
>  
> @@ -536,15 +537,18 @@ void do_secure_storage_access(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  		vma = find_vma(mm, addr);
>  		if (!vma)
>  			return handle_fault_error(regs, SEGV_MAPERR);
> -		page = follow_page(vma, addr, FOLL_WRITE | FOLL_GET);
> -		if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(page)) {
> +		folio = folio_walk_start(&fw, vma, addr, 0);
> +		if (!folio) {
>  			mmap_read_unlock(mm);
>  			break;
>  		}
> -		folio = page_folio(page);
> -		if (arch_make_folio_accessible(folio))
> -			send_sig(SIGSEGV, current, 0);
> +		/* arch_make_folio_accessible() needs a raised refcount. */
> +		folio_get(folio);
> +		rc = arch_make_folio_accessible(folio);
>  		folio_put(folio);
> +		folio_walk_end(&fw, vma);
> +		if (rc)
> +			send_sig(SIGSEGV, current, 0);
>  		mmap_read_unlock(mm);
>  		break;
>  	case KERNEL_FAULT:


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ