[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240807125633.dlwr6rx6yzl4ippv@quack3>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 14:56:33 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, sdf@...gle.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, mkarsten@...terloo.ca,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] eventpoll: Don't re-zero eventpoll fields
On Wed 07-08-24 10:52:31, Joe Damato wrote:
> Remove redundant and unnecessary code.
>
> ep_alloc uses kzalloc to create struct eventpoll, so there is no need to
> set fields to defaults of 0. This was accidentally introduced in commit
> 85455c795c07 ("eventpoll: support busy poll per epoll instance") and
> expanded on in follow-up commits.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
> Reviewed-by: Martin Karsten <mkarsten@...terloo.ca>
Looks good. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/eventpoll.c | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
> index f53ca4f7fced..6c0a1e9715ea 100644
> --- a/fs/eventpoll.c
> +++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
> @@ -2200,11 +2200,6 @@ static int do_epoll_create(int flags)
> error = PTR_ERR(file);
> goto out_free_fd;
> }
> -#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL
> - ep->busy_poll_usecs = 0;
> - ep->busy_poll_budget = 0;
> - ep->prefer_busy_poll = false;
> -#endif
> ep->file = file;
> fd_install(fd, file);
> return fd;
> --
> 2.25.1
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists