lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240807132922.GC27715@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 15:29:22 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, mhiramat@...nel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, paulmck@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] uprobes: RCU-protected hot path optimizations

On 07/31, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>
> Andrii Nakryiko (6):
>   uprobes: revamp uprobe refcounting and lifetime management
>   uprobes: protected uprobe lifetime with SRCU
>   uprobes: get rid of enum uprobe_filter_ctx in uprobe filter callbacks
>   uprobes: travers uprobe's consumer list locklessly under SRCU
>     protection
>   uprobes: perform lockless SRCU-protected uprobes_tree lookup
>   uprobes: switch to RCU Tasks Trace flavor for better performance
>
> Peter Zijlstra (2):
>   rbtree: provide rb_find_rcu() / rb_find_add_rcu()
>   perf/uprobe: split uprobe_unregister()

I see nothing wrong in 1-7. LGTM.

But since you are going to send the new version, I'd like to apply V2
and then try to re-check the resulting code.

As for 8/8 - I leave it to you and Peter. I'd prefer SRCU though ;)

Oleg.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ