[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240809194335.1726916-20-seanjc@google.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 12:43:31 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 19/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Add infrastructure to allow walking rmaps
outside of mmu_lock
Steal another bit from rmap entries (which are word aligned pointers, i.e.
have 2 free bits on 32-bit KVM, and 3 free bits on 64-bit KVM), and use
the bit to implement a *very* rudimentary per-rmap spinlock. The only
anticipated usage of the lock outside of mmu_lock is for aging gfns, and
collisions between aging and other MMU rmap operations are quite rare,
e.g. unless userspace is being silly and aging a tiny range over and over
in a tight loop, time between contention when aging an actively running VM
is O(seconds). In short, a more sophisticated locking scheme shouldn't be
necessary.
Note, the lock only protects the rmap structure itself, SPTEs that are
pointed at by a locked rmap can still be modified and zapped by another
task (KVM drops/zaps SPTEs before deleting the rmap entries)
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 8ca7f51c2da3..a683b5fc4026 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -909,11 +909,73 @@ static struct kvm_memory_slot *gfn_to_memslot_dirty_bitmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu
* About rmap_head encoding:
*
* If the bit zero of rmap_head->val is clear, then it points to the only spte
- * in this rmap chain. Otherwise, (rmap_head->val & ~1) points to a struct
+ * in this rmap chain. Otherwise, (rmap_head->val & ~3) points to a struct
* pte_list_desc containing more mappings.
*/
#define KVM_RMAP_MANY BIT(0)
+/*
+ * rmaps and PTE lists are mostly protected by mmu_lock (the shadow MMU always
+ * operates with mmu_lock held for write), but rmaps can be walked without
+ * holding mmu_lock so long as the caller can tolerate SPTEs in the rmap chain
+ * being zapped/dropped _while the rmap is locked_.
+ *
+ * Other than the KVM_RMAP_LOCKED flag, modifications to rmap entries must be
+ * done while holding mmu_lock for write. This allows a task walking rmaps
+ * without holding mmu_lock to concurrently walk the same entries as a task
+ * that is holding mmu_lock but _not_ the rmap lock. Neither task will modify
+ * the rmaps, thus the walks are stable.
+ *
+ * As alluded to above, SPTEs in rmaps are _not_ protected by KVM_RMAP_LOCKED,
+ * only the rmap chains themselves are protected. E.g. holding an rmap's lock
+ * ensures all "struct pte_list_desc" fields are stable.
+ */
+#define KVM_RMAP_LOCKED BIT(1)
+
+static unsigned long kvm_rmap_lock(struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head)
+{
+ unsigned long old_val, new_val;
+
+ old_val = READ_ONCE(rmap_head->val);
+ if (!old_val)
+ return 0;
+
+ do {
+ /*
+ * If the rmap is locked, wait for it to be unlocked before
+ * trying acquire the lock, e.g. to bounce the cache line.
+ */
+ while (old_val & KVM_RMAP_LOCKED) {
+ old_val = READ_ONCE(rmap_head->val);
+ cpu_relax();
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Recheck for an empty rmap, it may have been purged by the
+ * task that held the lock.
+ */
+ if (!old_val)
+ return 0;
+
+ new_val = old_val | KVM_RMAP_LOCKED;
+ } while (!try_cmpxchg(&rmap_head->val, &old_val, new_val));
+
+ /* Return the old value, i.e. _without_ the LOCKED bit set. */
+ return old_val;
+}
+
+static void kvm_rmap_unlock(struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
+ unsigned long new_val)
+{
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(new_val & KVM_RMAP_LOCKED);
+ WRITE_ONCE(rmap_head->val, new_val);
+}
+
+static unsigned long kvm_rmap_get(struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head)
+{
+ return READ_ONCE(rmap_head->val) & ~KVM_RMAP_LOCKED;
+}
+
/*
* Returns the number of pointers in the rmap chain, not counting the new one.
*/
@@ -924,7 +986,7 @@ static int pte_list_add(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache, u64 *spte,
struct pte_list_desc *desc;
int count = 0;
- old_val = rmap_head->val;
+ old_val = kvm_rmap_lock(rmap_head);
if (!old_val) {
new_val = (unsigned long)spte;
@@ -956,7 +1018,7 @@ static int pte_list_add(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache, u64 *spte,
desc->sptes[desc->spte_count++] = spte;
}
- rmap_head->val = new_val;
+ kvm_rmap_unlock(rmap_head, new_val);
return count;
}
@@ -1004,7 +1066,7 @@ static void pte_list_remove(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *spte,
unsigned long rmap_val;
int i;
- rmap_val = rmap_head->val;
+ rmap_val = kvm_rmap_lock(rmap_head);
if (KVM_BUG_ON_DATA_CORRUPTION(!rmap_val, kvm))
goto out;
@@ -1030,7 +1092,7 @@ static void pte_list_remove(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *spte,
}
out:
- rmap_head->val = rmap_val;
+ kvm_rmap_unlock(rmap_head, rmap_val);
}
static void kvm_zap_one_rmap_spte(struct kvm *kvm,
@@ -1048,7 +1110,7 @@ static bool kvm_zap_all_rmap_sptes(struct kvm *kvm,
unsigned long rmap_val;
int i;
- rmap_val = rmap_head->val;
+ rmap_val = kvm_rmap_lock(rmap_head);
if (!rmap_val)
return false;
@@ -1067,13 +1129,13 @@ static bool kvm_zap_all_rmap_sptes(struct kvm *kvm,
}
out:
/* rmap_head is meaningless now, remember to reset it */
- rmap_head->val = 0;
+ kvm_rmap_unlock(rmap_head, 0);
return true;
}
unsigned int pte_list_count(struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head)
{
- unsigned long rmap_val = rmap_head->val;
+ unsigned long rmap_val = kvm_rmap_get(rmap_head);
struct pte_list_desc *desc;
if (!rmap_val)
@@ -1139,7 +1201,7 @@ struct rmap_iterator {
static u64 *rmap_get_first(struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
struct rmap_iterator *iter)
{
- unsigned long rmap_val = rmap_head->val;
+ unsigned long rmap_val = kvm_rmap_get(rmap_head);
u64 *sptep;
if (!rmap_val)
--
2.46.0.76.ge559c4bf1a-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists