linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET 00/10] perf tools: Sync tools and kernel headers for v6.11

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAM9d7ch5U1SvgEKiDB4djR70eps_zhaBSWa2guW9NJj6T4ehog@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 12:46:11 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@....com>, 
	James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>, Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>, 
	Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, 
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, 
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	linux-perf-users <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET 00/10] perf tools: Sync tools and kernel headers for v6.11

On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 8:39 AM Athira Rajeev
<atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 9 Aug 2024, at 12:14 AM, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 12:14:12PM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 7 Aug 2024, at 11:42 PM, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hello folks,
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 03:50:03PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >>>> Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>> This is the usual sync up in header files we keep in tools directory.
> >>>> I put a file to give the reason of this work and not to repeat it in
> >>>> every commit message.  The changes will be carried in the perf-tools
> >>>> tree.
> >>>
> >>> Could you please double check what's in the tmp.perf-tools branch at the
> >>> perf-tools tree so I don't break build and perf trace for arm64, powerpc
> >>> and s390?  It has this patchset + arm64 unistd header revert (according
> >>> to the discussion on patch 6/10) on top of v6.11-rc2.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Namhyung
> >> Hi Namhyung,
> >>
> >> Can you please point to the tree. I checked in https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git as well as https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git , but didn’t find the changes. May be I am missing something. I am trying to check the build in powerpc.
> >
> > Oh, sorry about that.  It's in:
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools.git
> >
> > (no -next at the end)
>
> Hi,
>
> I did compile test on powerpc and results are good.
>
> Tested-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

Thanks for doing this!
Namhyung