[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aead8fc9-c60a-9ac6-280e-b2b9de85727c@gentwo.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 14:10:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Christoph Lameter (Ampere)" <cl@...two.org>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
cc: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org,
david@...hat.com, willy@...radead.org, ryan.roberts@....com,
anshuman.khandual@....com, catalin.marinas@....com, vbabka@...e.cz,
mhocko@...e.com, apopple@...dia.com, osalvador@...e.de,
baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
will@...nel.org, baohua@...nel.org, ioworker0@...il.com, gshan@...hat.com,
mark.rutland@....com, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, hughd@...gle.com,
aneesh.kumar@...nel.org, yang@...amperecomputing.com, peterx@...hat.com,
broonie@...nel.org, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests/mm: Do not fail test for a single migration
failure
On Fri, 9 Aug 2024, Shuah Khan wrote:
> "Given that migration is a best-effort service, it is wrong to fail the
> test for just a single failure; hence, fail the test after 100 consecutive
> failures (where 100 is still a subjective choice)."
>
> You do want to mention the above here.
>
> The reason being, I would like to know what this does to the run-time of
> this test if migration fails and retried 100 times.
If we backoff earlier without engaging too much with the page then we can
in turn affort to retry more times.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists