[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <026fa7ad-f8d2-49a3-8a1a-0efdae343504@tuxon.dev>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 09:29:19 +0300
From: claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>
To: Andrei.Simion@...rochip.com, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com,
alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: microchip: Rename node, sub-node, and clean up
spacing
Hi, Andrei,
On 08.08.2024 17:25, Andrei.Simion@...rochip.com wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/at91sam9g25-gardena-smart-gateway.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/at91sam9g25-gardena-smart-gateway.dts
>>> index af70eb8a3a02..60560e4c1696 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/at91sam9g25-gardena-smart-gateway.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/at91sam9g25-gardena-smart-gateway.dts
>>> @@ -37,71 +37,71 @@ button {
>>> leds {
>>> compatible = "gpio-leds";
>>>
>>> - power_blue {
>>> + led-0 {
>>> label = "smartgw:power:blue";
>>> gpios = <&pioC 21 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>> default-state = "off";
>>> };
>>>
>>> - power_green {
>>> + led-1 {
>>> label = "smartgw:power:green";
>>> gpios = <&pioC 20 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>> default-state = "on";
>>> };
>>>
>>> - power_red {
>>> + led-2 {
>>> label = "smartgw:power:red";
>>> gpios = <&pioC 19 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>> default-state = "off";
>>> };
>>>
>>> - radio_blue {
>>> + led-3 {
>>> label = "smartgw:radio:blue";
>>> gpios = <&pioC 18 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>> default-state = "off";
>>> };
>>>
>>> - radio_green {
>>> + led-4 {
>>> label = "smartgw:radio:green";
>>> gpios = <&pioC 17 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>> default-state = "off";
>>> };
>>>
>>> - radio_red {
>>> + led-5 {
>>> label = "smartgw:radio:red";
>>> gpios = <&pioC 16 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>> default-state = "off";
>>> };
>>>
>>> - internet_blue {
>>> + led-6 {
>>> label = "smartgw:internet:blue";
>>> gpios = <&pioC 15 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>> default-state = "off";
>>> };
>>>
>>> - internet_green {
>>> + led-7 {
>>> label = "smartgw:internet:green";
>>> gpios = <&pioC 14 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>> default-state = "off";
>>> };
>>>
>>> - internet_red {
>>> + led-8 {
>>> label = "smartgw:internet:red";
>>> gpios = <&pioC 13 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>> default-state = "off";
>>> };
>>>
>>> - heartbeat {
>>> + led-9 {
>>> label = "smartgw:heartbeat";
>>> gpios = <&pioB 8 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>> linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat";
>>> };
>>>
>>> - pb18 {
>>> + led-pb18 {
>>> status = "disabled";
>>> };
>>>
>>> - pd21 {
>>> + led-pd21 {
>> Why used led-<old-label> for some leds and led-<integer> for other? Valid
>> for other files.
>>
> I could have done either rule led-<old-label> or led-<integer>
> but we ended up with the old label being quite long.
> So, I use led-<integer> when <old-label> is too long.
> I don't think it was the best rule to rename.
> In your opinion, how would it be correct to rename these subnodes?
Keeping old label is OK. FYI, these particular changes were already
integrated with old labels being kept. See
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/at91/linux.git/commit/?id=b39c457205d0a3513fed1c3863e7cf9b6d72bf86
Thank you,
Claudiu Beznea
>
>
> PS: It is a problem on our side with the mail server. The e-mails may not arrive on the linux-arm-kernel mailing list.
>
> BR,
> Andrei Simion
Powered by blists - more mailing lists