lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240809072557.GA734505@neeraj.linux>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 12:55:58 +0530
From: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
	John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ryo Takakura <takakura@...inux.co.jp>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the printk tree

Hi Stephen

On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 12:23:21PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   9a30ceb4d93e ("rcu: Mark emergency sections in rcu stalls")
> 
> from the printk tree and commits:
> 
>   34863005f96e ("rcu: Extract synchronize_rcu_expedited_stall() from synchronize_rcu_expedited_wait()")
>   c925e2f61399 ("rcu: Let dump_cpu_task() be used without preemption disabled")
> 
> from the rcu tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
> 

Thank you! The resolution looks good to me. I will mention this conflict
during PR submission and coordinate with the maintainer of the printk
tree.


- Neeraj

> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> index be2d251e84f8,c3266bf709d5..000000000000
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> @@@ -543,6 -542,67 +543,68 @@@ static bool synchronize_rcu_expedited_w
>   	return false;
>   }
>   
> + /*
> +  * Print out an expedited RCU CPU stall warning message.
> +  */
> + static void synchronize_rcu_expedited_stall(unsigned long jiffies_start, unsigned long j)
> + {
> + 	int cpu;
> + 	unsigned long mask;
> + 	int ndetected;
> + 	struct rcu_node *rnp;
> + 	struct rcu_node *rnp_root = rcu_get_root();
> + 
> + 	if (READ_ONCE(csd_lock_suppress_rcu_stall) && csd_lock_is_stuck()) {
> + 		pr_err("INFO: %s detected expedited stalls, but suppressed full report due to a stuck CSD-lock.\n", rcu_state.name);
> + 		return;
> + 	}
> + 	pr_err("INFO: %s detected expedited stalls on CPUs/tasks: {", rcu_state.name);
> + 	ndetected = 0;
> + 	rcu_for_each_leaf_node(rnp) {
> + 		ndetected += rcu_print_task_exp_stall(rnp);
> + 		for_each_leaf_node_possible_cpu(rnp, cpu) {
> + 			struct rcu_data *rdp;
> + 
> + 			mask = leaf_node_cpu_bit(rnp, cpu);
> + 			if (!(READ_ONCE(rnp->expmask) & mask))
> + 				continue;
> + 			ndetected++;
> + 			rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
> + 			pr_cont(" %d-%c%c%c%c", cpu,
> + 				"O."[!!cpu_online(cpu)],
> + 				"o."[!!(rdp->grpmask & rnp->expmaskinit)],
> + 				"N."[!!(rdp->grpmask & rnp->expmaskinitnext)],
> + 				"D."[!!data_race(rdp->cpu_no_qs.b.exp)]);
> + 		}
> + 	}
> + 	pr_cont(" } %lu jiffies s: %lu root: %#lx/%c\n",
> + 		j - jiffies_start, rcu_state.expedited_sequence, data_race(rnp_root->expmask),
> + 		".T"[!!data_race(rnp_root->exp_tasks)]);
> + 	if (ndetected) {
> + 		pr_err("blocking rcu_node structures (internal RCU debug):");
> + 		rcu_for_each_node_breadth_first(rnp) {
> + 			if (rnp == rnp_root)
> + 				continue; /* printed unconditionally */
> + 			if (sync_rcu_exp_done_unlocked(rnp))
> + 				continue;
> + 			pr_cont(" l=%u:%d-%d:%#lx/%c",
> + 				rnp->level, rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi, data_race(rnp->expmask),
> + 				".T"[!!data_race(rnp->exp_tasks)]);
> + 		}
> + 		pr_cont("\n");
> + 	}
> + 	rcu_for_each_leaf_node(rnp) {
> + 		for_each_leaf_node_possible_cpu(rnp, cpu) {
> + 			mask = leaf_node_cpu_bit(rnp, cpu);
> + 			if (!(READ_ONCE(rnp->expmask) & mask))
> + 				continue;
> + 			dump_cpu_task(cpu);
> ++			nbcon_cpu_emergency_flush();
> + 		}
> + 		rcu_exp_print_detail_task_stall_rnp(rnp);
> + 	}
> + }
> + 
>   /*
>    * Wait for the expedited grace period to elapse, issuing any needed
>    * RCU CPU stall warnings along the way.
> @@@ -597,60 -652,8 +657,11 @@@ static void synchronize_rcu_expedited_w
>   		j = jiffies;
>   		rcu_stall_notifier_call_chain(RCU_STALL_NOTIFY_EXP, (void *)(j - jiffies_start));
>   		trace_rcu_stall_warning(rcu_state.name, TPS("ExpeditedStall"));
> - 		pr_err("INFO: %s detected expedited stalls on CPUs/tasks: {",
> - 		       rcu_state.name);
> - 		ndetected = 0;
> - 		rcu_for_each_leaf_node(rnp) {
> - 			ndetected += rcu_print_task_exp_stall(rnp);
> - 			for_each_leaf_node_possible_cpu(rnp, cpu) {
> - 				struct rcu_data *rdp;
> - 
> - 				mask = leaf_node_cpu_bit(rnp, cpu);
> - 				if (!(READ_ONCE(rnp->expmask) & mask))
> - 					continue;
> - 				ndetected++;
> - 				rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
> - 				pr_cont(" %d-%c%c%c%c", cpu,
> - 					"O."[!!cpu_online(cpu)],
> - 					"o."[!!(rdp->grpmask & rnp->expmaskinit)],
> - 					"N."[!!(rdp->grpmask & rnp->expmaskinitnext)],
> - 					"D."[!!data_race(rdp->cpu_no_qs.b.exp)]);
> - 			}
> - 		}
> - 		pr_cont(" } %lu jiffies s: %lu root: %#lx/%c\n",
> - 			j - jiffies_start, rcu_state.expedited_sequence,
> - 			data_race(rnp_root->expmask),
> - 			".T"[!!data_race(rnp_root->exp_tasks)]);
> - 		if (ndetected) {
> - 			pr_err("blocking rcu_node structures (internal RCU debug):");
> - 			rcu_for_each_node_breadth_first(rnp) {
> - 				if (rnp == rnp_root)
> - 					continue; /* printed unconditionally */
> - 				if (sync_rcu_exp_done_unlocked(rnp))
> - 					continue;
> - 				pr_cont(" l=%u:%d-%d:%#lx/%c",
> - 					rnp->level, rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi,
> - 					data_race(rnp->expmask),
> - 					".T"[!!data_race(rnp->exp_tasks)]);
> - 			}
> - 			pr_cont("\n");
> - 		}
> - 		rcu_for_each_leaf_node(rnp) {
> - 			for_each_leaf_node_possible_cpu(rnp, cpu) {
> - 				mask = leaf_node_cpu_bit(rnp, cpu);
> - 				if (!(READ_ONCE(rnp->expmask) & mask))
> - 					continue;
> - 				preempt_disable(); // For smp_processor_id() in dump_cpu_task().
> - 				dump_cpu_task(cpu);
> - 				preempt_enable();
> - 				nbcon_cpu_emergency_flush();
> - 			}
> - 			rcu_exp_print_detail_task_stall_rnp(rnp);
> - 		}
> + 		synchronize_rcu_expedited_stall(jiffies_start, j);
>   		jiffies_stall = 3 * rcu_exp_jiffies_till_stall_check() + 3;
>  +
>  +		nbcon_cpu_emergency_exit();
>  +
>   		panic_on_rcu_stall();
>   	}
>   }



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ