[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240809093313.xn3x2p3st2b32g27@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 11:33:13 +0200
From: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] usb: hub: add infrastructure to pass onboard_dev
port features
Hi all,
On 24-08-08, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Marco,
>
> kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on 0c3836482481200ead7b416ca80c68a29cfdaabd]
>
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Marco-Felsch/usb-hub-add-infrastructure-to-pass-onboard_dev-port-features/20240807-224100
> base: 0c3836482481200ead7b416ca80c68a29cfdaabd
> patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240807-b4-v6-10-topic-usb-onboard-dev-v1-1-f33ce21353c9%40pengutronix.de
> patch subject: [PATCH 1/3] usb: hub: add infrastructure to pass onboard_dev port features
> config: i386-randconfig-141-20240808 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240808/202408081557.FiEe9Tzz-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240808/202408081557.FiEe9Tzz-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202408081557.FiEe9Tzz-lkp@intel.com/
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> ld: drivers/usb/core/hub.o: in function `set_port_feature':
> >> drivers/usb/core/hub.c:481: undefined reference to `onboard_dev_port_feature'
> ld: drivers/usb/core/hub.o: in function `usb_clear_port_feature':
> drivers/usb/core/hub.c:462: undefined reference to `onboard_dev_port_feature'
I understood the isse but have a few questions. Before continue the work
on this topic I would like to ask if the patchset is okay in general?
I'm open for alternatives if the patchset approach is not okay.
I have a few ideas in mind (see below) to fix the 0day build issue which
was caused by the Kconfig selection:
- CONFIG_USB=y
- CONFIG_USB_ONBOARD_DEV=m.
Idea-1:
-------
Dropping the module support for CONFIG_USB_ONBOARD_DEV.
Idea-2:
-------
CONFIG_USB_ONBOARD_DEV follows CONFIG_USB:
CONFIG_USB=y -> CONFIG_USB_ONBOARD_DEV=y,
CONFIG_USB=m -> CONFIG_USB_ONBOARD_DEV=m.
and exporting usb_clear_port_feature().
I don't know to add such Kconfig dependency and also this idea require
that the usbcore have to load the usb_onboard_dev module always,
regardless if used.
So this idea is rather suboptimal.
Idea-3:
-------
Adding a function to the hub.c usbcore which can be used by the
usb-onboard-dev driver to register this function as hook. This removes
the dependency from the core and the usb-onboard-dev module is only
pulled if really required. Of course this require that the hub.c usbcore
driver allows custom hooks.
Idea-X:
-------
I'm open for your input :)
Regards,
Marco
PS: My favourite is Idea-3 followed by Idea-1.
> vim +481 drivers/usb/core/hub.c
>
> 466
> 467 /*
> 468 * USB 2.0 spec Section 11.24.2.13
> 469 */
> 470 static int set_port_feature(struct usb_device *hdev, int port1, int feature)
> 471 {
> 472 int ret;
> 473
> 474 ret = usb_control_msg(hdev, usb_sndctrlpipe(hdev, 0),
> 475 USB_REQ_SET_FEATURE, USB_RT_PORT, feature, port1,
> 476 NULL, 0, 1000);
> 477 if (ret)
> 478 return ret;
> 479
> 480 if (!is_root_hub(hdev))
> > 481 ret = onboard_dev_port_feature(hdev, true, feature, port1);
> 482
> 483 return ret;
> 484 }
> 485
>
> --
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists