[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4e06d3ee-de78-9a71-ccec-6c0a5aa0c7f6@google.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 16:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, slub: print CPU id on slab OOM
On Tue, 6 Aug 2024, Axel Rasmussen wrote:
> Depending on how remote_node_defrag_ratio is configured, allocations can
> end up in this path as a result of the local node being OOM, despite the
> allocation overall being unconstrained (node == -1).
>
> When we print a warning, printing the current CPU makes that situation
> more clear (i.e., you can immediately see which node's OOM status
> matters for the allocation at hand).
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists