| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <8734nb32f4.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2024 11:10:39 +0300
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>
Cc: jacobe.zang@...ion.com, Sai Krishna Gajula <saikrishnag@...vell.com>,
"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>, "krzk+dt@...nel.org"
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, "heiko@...ech.de" <heiko@...ech.de>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "edumazet@...gle.com"
<edumazet@...gle.com>, "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>, "conor+dt@...nel.org"
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, "efectn@...tonmail.com" <efectn@...tonmail.com>,
"dsimic@...jaro.org" <dsimic@...jaro.org>, "jagan@...eble.ai"
<jagan@...eble.ai>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "arend@...adcom.com"
<arend@...adcom.com>, "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "megi@....cz" <megi@....cz>,
"duoming@....edu.cn" <duoming@....edu.cn>, "bhelgaas@...gle.com"
<bhelgaas@...gle.com>, "minipli@...ecurity.net" <minipli@...ecurity.net>,
"brcm80211@...ts.linux.dev" <brcm80211@...ts.linux.dev>,
"brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com"
<brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com>, "nick@...das.com"
<nick@...das.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 4/5] wifi: brcmfmac: Add optional lpo clock enable
support
Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com> writes:
> On 8/10/2024 12:08 PM, jacobe.zang@...ion.com wrote:
>
>> On 2024/8/10 17:44, Sai Krishna Gajula <saikrishnag@...vell.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: Jacobe Zang <jacobe.zang@...ion.com>
>>> > Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2024 9:22 AM
>>> > To: robh@...nel.org; krzk+dt@...nel.org; heiko@...ech.de;
>>> > kvalo@...nel.org; davem@...emloft.net; edumazet@...gle.com;
>>> > kuba@...nel.org; pabeni@...hat.com; conor+dt@...nel.org;
>>> > arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com
>>> > Cc: efectn@...tonmail.com; dsimic@...jaro.org; jagan@...eble.ai;
>>> > devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org;
>>> linux-
>>> > rockchip@...ts.infradead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
>>> > arend@...adcom.com; linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org;
>>> > netdev@...r.kernel.org; megi@....cz; duoming@....edu.cn;
>>> > bhelgaas@...gle.com; minipli@...ecurity.net; brcm80211@...ts.linux.dev;
>>> > brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com; nick@...das.com; Jacobe Zang
>>> > <jacobe.zang@...ion.com>
>>> > Subject: [PATCH v9 4/5] wifi: brcmfmac: Add optional lpo clock
>>> > enable support
>>> >
>>> > WiFi modules often require 32kHz clock to function. Add support
>>> to enable
>>> > the clock to PCIe driver and move "brcm,bcm4329-fmac" check to
>>> the top of
>>> > brcmf_of_probe. Change function prototypes from void to int and add
>>> > appropriate errno's for return
>>> > WiFi modules often require 32kHz clock to function. Add support
>>> to enable
>>> > the clock to PCIe driver and move "brcm,bcm4329-fmac" check to
>>> the top of
>>> > brcmf_of_probe. Change function prototypes from void to int and add
>>> > appropriate errno's for return values that will be send to bus
>>> when error
>>> > occurred.
>>> >
>>> > Co-developed-by: Ondrej Jirman <megi@....cz>
>>> > Signed-off-by: Ondrej Jirman <megi@....cz>
>>> > Co-developed-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>
>>> > Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>
>>> > Signed-off-by: Jacobe Zang <jacobe.zang@...ion.com>
>>> > ---
>>> > .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c | 4 +-
>>> > .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/common.c | 3 +-
>>> > .../wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/of.c | 53
>>> +++++++++++--------
>>> > .../wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/of.h | 9 ++--
>>> > .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pcie.c | 3 ++
>>> > .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c | 24 ++++++---
>>> > .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/usb.c | 3 ++
>>> > 7 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>>> >
>>> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
>>> > b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
>>> > index 13391c2d82aae..b2ede4e579c5c 100644
>>> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
>>> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
>>> > @@ -947,8 +947,8 @@ int brcmf_sdiod_probe(struct brcmf_sdio_dev
>>> > *sdiodev)
>>> >
>>> > /* try to attach to the target device */
>>> > sdiodev->bus = brcmf_sdio_probe(sdiodev);
>>> > - if (!sdiodev->bus) {
>>> > - ret = -ENODEV;
>>> > + if (IS_ERR(sdiodev->bus)) {
>>> > + ret = PTR_ERR(sdiodev->bus);
>>> > goto out;
>>> > }
>>> > brcmf_sdiod_host_fixup(sdiodev->func2->card->host);
>>> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/common.c
>>> > b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/common.c
>>> > index b24faae35873d..58d50918dd177 100644
>>> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/common.c
>>> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/common.c
>>> > @@ -561,7 +561,8 @@ struct brcmf_mp_device
>>> > *brcmf_get_module_param(struct device *dev,
>>> > if (!found) {
>>> > /* No platform data for this device, try OF and DMI data */
>>> > brcmf_dmi_probe(settings, chip, chiprev);
>>> > - brcmf_of_probe(dev, bus_type, settings);
>>> > + if (brcmf_of_probe(dev, bus_type, settings) == -
>>> > EPROBE_DEFER)
>>> > + return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
>>> > brcmf_acpi_probe(dev, bus_type, settings);
>>> > }
>>> > return settings;
>>> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/of.c
>>> > b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/of.c
>>> > index e406e11481a62..f19dc7355e0e8 100644
>>> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/of.c
>>> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/of.c
>>> > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>>> > #include <linux/of.h>
>>> > #include <linux/of_irq.h>
>>> > #include <linux/of_net.h>
>>> > +#include <linux/clk.h>
>>> >
>>> > #include <defs.h>
>>> > #include "debug.h"
>>> > @@ -65,17 +66,21 @@ static int brcmf_of_get_country_codes(struct device
>>> > *dev,
>>> > return 0;
>>> > }
>>> >
>>> > -void brcmf_of_probe(struct device *dev, enum brcmf_bus_type bus_type,
>>> > - struct brcmf_mp_device *settings)
>>> > +int brcmf_of_probe(struct device *dev, enum brcmf_bus_type bus_type,
>>> > + struct brcmf_mp_device *settings)
>>> > {
>>> > struct brcmfmac_sdio_pd *sdio = &settings->bus.sdio;
>>> > struct device_node *root, *np = dev->of_node;
>>> > + struct clk *clk;
>>> > const char *prop;
>>>
>>> Small nit, please check if reverse x-mas tree order need to be
>>> follow here.
>>>
>>> > int irq;
>>> > int err;
>>> > u32 irqf;
>> It can be seen from this line that there should be no need to follow
>> the reverse x-mas tree order. Because it is a struct variable, so
>> place with other struct ones.
>
> As driver maintainer I do not care about such neatness, but maybe
> Kalle has another preference. The code above looks fine to me.
We haven't been strongly requiring reverse x-mas tree in wireless code,
it has been just a preference. Also for me the code above looks fine.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists