[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202408112059.XkTMhslU-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2024 20:17:24 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: llvm@...ts.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org, james.quinlan@...adcom.com,
justin.chen@...adcom.com, kapil.hali@...adcom.com,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Support 'reg-io-width' property
for shared memory
Hi Florian,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on next-20240809]
[cannot apply to robh/for-next soc/for-next linus/master v6.11-rc2 v6.11-rc1 v6.10 v6.11-rc2]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Florian-Fainelli/dt-bindings-sram-Document-reg-io-width-property/20240811-055659
base: next-20240809
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240810214621.14417-3-florian.fainelli%40broadcom.com
patch subject: [PATCH 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Support 'reg-io-width' property for shared memory
config: hexagon-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240811/202408112059.XkTMhslU-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 20.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f86594788ce93b696675c94f54016d27a6c21d18)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240811/202408112059.XkTMhslU-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202408112059.XkTMhslU-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/shmem.c:9:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:14:
In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:328:
include/asm-generic/io.h:548:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
548 | val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:561:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
561 | val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:37:51: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
| ^
In file included from drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/shmem.c:9:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:14:
In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:328:
include/asm-generic/io.h:574:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
574 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:35:51: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
| ^
In file included from drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/shmem.c:9:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:14:
In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:328:
include/asm-generic/io.h:585:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
585 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:595:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
595 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:605:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
605 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/shmem.c:98:4: error: call to undeclared function 'iowrite64'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
98 | __shmem_copy_toio_tpl(64);
| ^
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/shmem.c:39:3: note: expanded from macro '__shmem_copy_toio_tpl'
39 | iowrite##s(((u##s *)(xfer->tx.buf))[i / shmem_io_width], \
| ^
<scratch space>:43:1: note: expanded from here
43 | iowrite64
| ^
6 warnings and 1 error generated.
vim +/iowrite64 +98 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/shmem.c
36
37 #define __shmem_copy_toio_tpl(s) \
38 for (unsigned int i = 0; i < xfer->tx.len; i += shmem_io_width) \
39 iowrite##s(((u##s *)(xfer->tx.buf))[i / shmem_io_width], \
40 shmem->msg_payload + i);
41
42 #define __shmem_copy_fromio_tpl(s) \
43 for (unsigned int i = 0; i < xfer->rx.len; i += shmem_io_width) \
44 ((u##s *)(xfer->rx.buf))[i / shmem_io_width] = \
45 ioread##s(shmem->msg_payload + shmem_io_width + i);
46
47 static void shmem_tx_prepare(struct scmi_shared_mem __iomem *shmem,
48 struct scmi_xfer *xfer,
49 struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo,
50 u32 shmem_io_width)
51 {
52 ktime_t stop;
53
54 /*
55 * Ideally channel must be free by now unless OS timeout last
56 * request and platform continued to process the same, wait
57 * until it releases the shared memory, otherwise we may endup
58 * overwriting its response with new message payload or vice-versa.
59 * Giving up anyway after twice the expected channel timeout so as
60 * not to bail-out on intermittent issues where the platform is
61 * occasionally a bit slower to answer.
62 *
63 * Note that after a timeout is detected we bail-out and carry on but
64 * the transport functionality is probably permanently compromised:
65 * this is just to ease debugging and avoid complete hangs on boot
66 * due to a misbehaving SCMI firmware.
67 */
68 stop = ktime_add_ms(ktime_get(), 2 * cinfo->rx_timeout_ms);
69 spin_until_cond((ioread32(&shmem->channel_status) &
70 SCMI_SHMEM_CHAN_STAT_CHANNEL_FREE) ||
71 ktime_after(ktime_get(), stop));
72 if (!(ioread32(&shmem->channel_status) &
73 SCMI_SHMEM_CHAN_STAT_CHANNEL_FREE)) {
74 WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
75 dev_err(cinfo->dev,
76 "Timeout waiting for a free TX channel !\n");
77 return;
78 }
79
80 /* Mark channel busy + clear error */
81 iowrite32(0x0, &shmem->channel_status);
82 iowrite32(xfer->hdr.poll_completion ? 0 : SCMI_SHMEM_FLAG_INTR_ENABLED,
83 &shmem->flags);
84 iowrite32(sizeof(shmem->msg_header) + xfer->tx.len, &shmem->length);
85 iowrite32(pack_scmi_header(&xfer->hdr), &shmem->msg_header);
86 if (xfer->tx.buf) {
87 switch (shmem_io_width) {
88 case 1:
89 __shmem_copy_toio_tpl(8);
90 break;
91 case 2:
92 __shmem_copy_toio_tpl(16);
93 break;
94 case 4:
95 __shmem_copy_toio_tpl(32);
96 break;
97 case 8:
> 98 __shmem_copy_toio_tpl(64);
99 break;
100 default:
101 memcpy_toio(shmem->msg_payload, xfer->tx.buf, xfer->tx.len);
102 break;
103 }
104 }
105 }
106
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists