lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cdfc5a08-c0ee-30a3-d6c5-22d4cfddc3a4@google.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2024 13:30:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Pedro Falcato <pedro.falcato@...il.com>
cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, 
    Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, 
    Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, 
    Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, 
    Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>, 
    Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org, 
    linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] slab: Warn on duplicate cache names when DEBUG_VM=y

On Wed, 7 Aug 2024, Pedro Falcato wrote:

> diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
> index 40b582a014b..1abe6a577d5 100644
> --- a/mm/slab_common.c
> +++ b/mm/slab_common.c
> @@ -88,6 +88,19 @@ unsigned int kmem_cache_size(struct kmem_cache *s)
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_size);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
> +
> +static bool kmem_cache_is_duplicate_name(const char *name)
> +{
> +	struct kmem_cache *s;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(s, &slab_caches, list) {
> +		if (!strcmp(s->name, name))
> +			return true;
> +	}
> +
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>  static int kmem_cache_sanity_check(const char *name, unsigned int size)
>  {
>  	if (!name || in_interrupt() || size > KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE) {
> @@ -95,6 +108,11 @@ static int kmem_cache_sanity_check(const char *name, unsigned int size)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (kmem_cache_is_duplicate_name(name)) {
> +		/* Duplicate names will confuse slabtop, et al */
> +		pr_warn("%s: name %s already exists as a cache\n", __func__, name);


Shouldn't this be a full WARN_ON() instead of pr_warn()?  I assume we'll 
be interested in who is adding the cache when the name already exists.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ