[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <91d29649-ca88-4f6c-bf1d-19e49c9555df@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 23:11:07 -0400
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: steffen.klassert@...unet.com, daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] padata: Fix possible divide-by-0 panic in
padata_mt_helper()
On 8/10/24 21:45, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 09:30:25PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> On 8/10/24 00:05, Herbert Xu wrote:
>>> Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com> wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/kernel/padata.c b/kernel/padata.c
>>>> index 53f4bc912712..0fa6c2895460 100644
>>>> --- a/kernel/padata.c
>>>> +++ b/kernel/padata.c
>>>> @@ -517,6 +517,13 @@ void __init padata_do_multithreaded(struct padata_mt_job *job)
>>>> ps.chunk_size = max(ps.chunk_size, job->min_chunk);
>>>> ps.chunk_size = roundup(ps.chunk_size, job->align);
>>>>
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * chunk_size can be 0 if the caller sets min_chunk to 0. So force it
>>>> + * to at least 1 to prevent divide-by-0 panic in padata_mt_helper().`
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (!ps.chunk_size)
>>>> + ps.chunk_size = 1U;
>>> Perhaps change the first ps.chunk_size assignment to use DIV_ROUND_UP
>>> instead?
>> I think DIV_ROUND_UP() will exactly the same problem that if chunk_size is
>> 0, you still got a 0 result. round_up() only if the 2nd argument is a power
>> of 2 while with DIV_ROUND_UP(), the second argument can be any number except
>> 0.
> Unless I'm missing something chunk_size cannot be zero before the
> division because that's the first thing we check upon entry into
> this function.
chunk_size is initialized as
ps.chunk_size = job->size / (ps.nworks * load_balance_factor);
chunk_size will be 0 if job->size < (ps.nworks * load_balance_factor).
If min_chunk is 0, chunk_size will remain 0.
After looking at the dump file when the crash happen at
padata_mt_helper(). I had determined that ps->chunk_size was indeed 0
which caused the divide-by-0 panic. I actually got 2 different bug
reports of this div-by-0 panic, one with a debug and another one with a
non-debug kernel.
Cheers,
Longman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists