lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZrlRggozUT6dJRh+@dread.disaster.area>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 10:04:18 +1000
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Anders Blomdell <anders.blomdell@...il.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@...cle.com>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: XFS mount timeout in linux-6.9.11

On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 at 10:17:50AM +0200, Anders Blomdell wrote:
> On 2024-08-11 01:11, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 10:29:38AM +0200, Anders Blomdell wrote:
> > > On 2024-08-10 00:55, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 07:08:41PM +0200, Anders Blomdell wrote:
> > > echo $(uname -r) $(date +%H:%M:%S) > /dev/kmsg
> > > mount /dev/vg1/test /test
> > > echo $(uname -r) $(date +%H:%M:%S) > /dev/kmsg
> > > umount /test
> > > echo $(uname -r) $(date +%H:%M:%S) > /dev/kmsg
> > > mount /dev/vg1/test /test
> > > echo $(uname -r) $(date +%H:%M:%S) > /dev/kmsg
> > > 
> > > [55581.470484] 6.8.0-rc4-00129-g14dd46cf31f4 09:17:20
> > > [55581.492733] XFS (dm-7): Mounting V5 Filesystem e2159bbc-18fb-4d4b-a6c5-14c97b8e5380
> > > [56048.292804] XFS (dm-7): Ending clean mount
> > > [56516.433008] 6.8.0-rc4-00129-g14dd46cf31f4 09:32:55
> > 
> > So it took ~450s to determine that the mount was clean, then another
> > 450s to return to userspace?
> Yeah, that aligns with my userspace view that the mount takes 15 minutes.
> > 
> > > [56516.434695] XFS (dm-7): Unmounting Filesystem e2159bbc-18fb-4d4b-a6c5-14c97b8e5380
> > > [56516.925145] 6.8.0-rc4-00129-g14dd46cf31f4 09:32:56
> > > [56517.039873] XFS (dm-7): Mounting V5 Filesystem e2159bbc-18fb-4d4b-a6c5-14c97b8e5380
> > > [56986.017144] XFS (dm-7): Ending clean mount
> > > [57454.876371] 6.8.0-rc4-00129-g14dd46cf31f4 09:48:34
> > 
> > Same again.
> > 
> > Can you post the 'xfs_info /mnt/pt' for that filesystem?
> # uname -r ; xfs_info /test
> 6.8.0-rc4-00128-g8541a7d9da2d
> meta-data=/dev/mapper/vg1-test isize=512    agcount=8, agsize=268435455 blks
>          =                       sectsz=4096  attr=2, projid32bit=1
>          =                       crc=1        finobt=1, sparse=0, rmapbt=0
>          =                       reflink=1    bigtime=0 inobtcount=0 nrext64=0
> data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=2147483640, imaxpct=20
>          =                       sunit=0      swidth=0 blks
> naming   =version 2              bsize=4096   ascii-ci=0, ftype=1
> log      =internal log           bsize=4096   blocks=521728, version=2
>          =                       sectsz=4096  sunit=1 blks, lazy-count=1
> realtime =none                   extsz=4096   blocks=0, rtextents=0

Ok, nothing I'd consider strange there.

> > > And rebooting to the kernel before the offending commit:
> > > 
> > > [   60.177951] 6.8.0-rc4-00128-g8541a7d9da2d 10:23:00
> > > [   61.009283] SGI XFS with ACLs, security attributes, realtime, scrub, quota, no debug enabled
> > > [   61.017422] XFS (dm-7): Mounting V5 Filesystem e2159bbc-18fb-4d4b-a6c5-14c97b8e5380
> > > [   61.351100] XFS (dm-7): Ending clean mount
> > > [   61.366359] 6.8.0-rc4-00128-g8541a7d9da2d 10:23:01
> > > [   61.367673] XFS (dm-7): Unmounting Filesystem e2159bbc-18fb-4d4b-a6c5-14c97b8e5380
> > > [   61.444552] 6.8.0-rc4-00128-g8541a7d9da2d 10:23:01
> > > [   61.459358] XFS (dm-7): Mounting V5 Filesystem e2159bbc-18fb-4d4b-a6c5-14c97b8e5380
> > > [   61.513938] XFS (dm-7): Ending clean mount
> > > [   61.524056] 6.8.0-rc4-00128-g8541a7d9da2d 10:23:01
> > 
> > Yeah, that's what I'd expect to see.

Ok, can you run the same series of commands but this time in another
shell run this command and leave it running for the entire
mount/unmount/mount/unmount sequence:

# trace-cmd record -e xfs\* -e printk

Then ctrl-c out of it, and run:

# trace-cmd report > xfs-mount-report.<kernel>.txt

on both kernels and send me the output (or a link that I can
download because it will probably be quite large even when
compressed) that is generated?

That will tell me what XFS is doing different at mount time on the
different kernels.

[snip stuff about git bisect]

I'll come back to the bisect if it's relevant once I know what XFS
is doing differently across the unmount/mount cycles on the two
different kernels.

-Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ