[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6a0c69d4-f614-4348-a28f-0d4a6fe08df8@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 09:55:23 -0700
From: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, apparmor@...ts.ubuntu.com,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] apparmor: fix policy_unpack_test on big endian systems
On 8/8/24 08:59, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> policy_unpack_test fails on big endian systems because data byte order
> is expected to be little endian but is generated in host byte order.
> This results in test failures such as:
>
> # policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_null_name: EXPECTATION FAILED at security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c:150
> Expected array_size == (u16)16, but
> array_size == 4096 (0x1000)
> (u16)16 == 16 (0x10)
> # policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_null_name: pass:0 fail:1 skip:0 total:1
> not ok 3 policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_null_name
> # policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_name: EXPECTATION FAILED at security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c:164
> Expected array_size == (u16)16, but
> array_size == 4096 (0x1000)
> (u16)16 == 16 (0x10)
> # policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_name: pass:0 fail:1 skip:0 total:1
>
> Add the missing endianness conversions when generating test data.
>
> Fixes: 4d944bcd4e73 ("apparmor: add AppArmor KUnit tests for policy unpack")
> Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Looks good
Acked-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
I will pull this into my tree
> ---
> security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c b/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c
> index 874fcf97794e..c64733d6c98f 100644
> --- a/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c
> +++ b/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c
> @@ -80,14 +80,14 @@ static struct aa_ext *build_aa_ext_struct(struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf,
> *(buf + 1) = strlen(TEST_U32_NAME) + 1;
> strscpy(buf + 3, TEST_U32_NAME, e->end - (void *)(buf + 3));
> *(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_U32_NAME) + 1) = AA_U32;
> - *((u32 *)(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_U32_NAME) + 2)) = TEST_U32_DATA;
> + *((__le32 *)(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_U32_NAME) + 2)) = cpu_to_le32(TEST_U32_DATA);
>
> buf = e->start + TEST_NAMED_U64_BUF_OFFSET;
> *buf = AA_NAME;
> *(buf + 1) = strlen(TEST_U64_NAME) + 1;
> strscpy(buf + 3, TEST_U64_NAME, e->end - (void *)(buf + 3));
> *(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_U64_NAME) + 1) = AA_U64;
> - *((u64 *)(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_U64_NAME) + 2)) = TEST_U64_DATA;
> + *((__le64 *)(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_U64_NAME) + 2)) = cpu_to_le64(TEST_U64_DATA);
>
> buf = e->start + TEST_NAMED_BLOB_BUF_OFFSET;
> *buf = AA_NAME;
> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static struct aa_ext *build_aa_ext_struct(struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf,
> *(buf + 1) = strlen(TEST_ARRAY_NAME) + 1;
> strscpy(buf + 3, TEST_ARRAY_NAME, e->end - (void *)(buf + 3));
> *(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_ARRAY_NAME) + 1) = AA_ARRAY;
> - *((u16 *)(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_ARRAY_NAME) + 2)) = TEST_ARRAY_SIZE;
> + *((__le16 *)(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_ARRAY_NAME) + 2)) = cpu_to_le16(TEST_ARRAY_SIZE);
>
> return e;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists