linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] init/main.c: Initialize early LSMs after arch code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHC9VhQjCHBii=CwMMnbs0hiiN-Dy49S+3gpDvaXp-YQyEHTGw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 15:33:06 -0400
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, bp@...en8.de, sfr@...b.auug.org.au, 
	peterz@...radead.org, ink@...assic.park.msu.ru, richard.henderson@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] init/main.c: Initialize early LSMs after arch code

On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 1:12 PM KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> JFYI, I synced with Guenter and all arch seem to pass and alpha does
> not work due to a reason that I am unable to debug. I will try doing
> more debugging but I will need more alpha help here (Added the
> maintainers to this thread).

Thanks for the update; I was hoping that we might have a resolution
for the Alpha failure by now but it doesn't look like we're that
lucky.  Hopefully the Alpha devs will be able to help resolve this
without too much trouble.

Unfortunately, this does mean that I'm going to drop the static call
patches from the lsm/dev branch so that we can continue merging other
things.  Of course this doesn't mean the static call patches can't
come back in later during this dev cycle once everything is solved if
there is still time, and worst case there is always the next dev
cycle.

-- 
paul-moore.com