[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240812212256.GA3675407@thelio-3990X>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 14:22:56 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] modpost: simplify modpost_log()
Hi Masahiro,
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 11:45:39PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> With commit cda5f94e88b4 ("modpost: avoid using the alias attribute"),
> only two log levels remain: LOG_WARN and LOG_ERROR. Simplify this by
> making it a boolean variable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
> ---
>
> scripts/mod/modpost.c | 17 ++++++-----------
> scripts/mod/modpost.h | 11 +++--------
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/mod/modpost.c b/scripts/mod/modpost.c
> index d0f138803207..c896872862dc 100644
> --- a/scripts/mod/modpost.c
> +++ b/scripts/mod/modpost.c
> @@ -67,20 +67,15 @@ static unsigned int nr_unresolved;
>
> #define MODULE_NAME_LEN (64 - sizeof(Elf_Addr))
>
> -void modpost_log(enum loglevel loglevel, const char *fmt, ...)
> +void modpost_log(bool is_error, const char *fmt, ...)
> {
> va_list arglist;
>
> - switch (loglevel) {
> - case LOG_WARN:
> - fprintf(stderr, "WARNING: ");
> - break;
> - case LOG_ERROR:
> + if (is_error) {
> fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: ");
> error_occurred = true;
> - break;
> - default: /* invalid loglevel, ignore */
> - break;
> + } else {
> + fprintf(stderr, "WARNING: ");
> }
>
> fprintf(stderr, "modpost: ");
> @@ -1692,7 +1687,7 @@ static void check_exports(struct module *mod)
> exp = find_symbol(s->name);
> if (!exp) {
> if (!s->weak && nr_unresolved++ < MAX_UNRESOLVED_REPORTS)
> - modpost_log(warn_unresolved ? LOG_WARN : LOG_ERROR,
> + modpost_log(warn_unresolved,
I think the logic is reversed here? If warn_unresolved was true before,
LOG_WARN would be used but I think warn_unresolved being true with this
change would trigger the behavior of LOG_ERROR. Should it be
'!warn_unresolved'?
> "\"%s\" [%s.ko] undefined!\n",
> s->name, mod->name);
> continue;
> @@ -1715,7 +1710,7 @@ static void check_exports(struct module *mod)
> basename = mod->name;
>
> if (!contains_namespace(&mod->imported_namespaces, exp->namespace)) {
> - modpost_log(allow_missing_ns_imports ? LOG_WARN : LOG_ERROR,
> + modpost_log(allow_missing_ns_imports,
Same thing here?
Alternatively, I suppose the logic could be reversed in modpost_log()
and is_error could be turned into no_error or something?
> "module %s uses symbol %s from namespace %s, but does not import it.\n",
> basename, exp->name, exp->namespace);
> add_namespace(&mod->missing_namespaces, exp->namespace);
> diff --git a/scripts/mod/modpost.h b/scripts/mod/modpost.h
> index f756e6578b9e..6f418f0afd04 100644
> --- a/scripts/mod/modpost.h
> +++ b/scripts/mod/modpost.h
> @@ -184,13 +184,8 @@ char *read_text_file(const char *filename);
> char *get_line(char **stringp);
> void *sym_get_data(const struct elf_info *info, const Elf_Sym *sym);
>
> -enum loglevel {
> - LOG_WARN,
> - LOG_ERROR,
> -};
> -
> void __attribute__((format(printf, 2, 3)))
> -modpost_log(enum loglevel loglevel, const char *fmt, ...);
> +modpost_log(bool is_error, const char *fmt, ...);
>
> /*
> * warn - show the given message, then let modpost continue running, still
> @@ -205,6 +200,6 @@ modpost_log(enum loglevel loglevel, const char *fmt, ...);
> * fatal - show the given message, and bail out immediately. This should be
> * used when there is no point to continue running modpost.
> */
> -#define warn(fmt, args...) modpost_log(LOG_WARN, fmt, ##args)
> -#define error(fmt, args...) modpost_log(LOG_ERROR, fmt, ##args)
> +#define warn(fmt, args...) modpost_log(false, fmt, ##args)
> +#define error(fmt, args...) modpost_log(true, fmt, ##args)
I suppose the declaration of modpost_log() is close enough to see what
the true/false argument means but maybe something like
modpost_log(/* is_error = */ false, ...)
could be nice? No strong opinion here though, feel free to just ignore
this whole comment entirely if you disagree!
> #define fatal(fmt, args...) do { error(fmt, ##args); exit(1); } while (1)
> --
> 2.43.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists