[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+-6iNzDcF3pA1T3FuGNS4NPn1RrjHxxAVStN6t++xDsx-wUXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 18:07:54 -0400
From: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Cyril Brulebois <kibi@...ian.org>, Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...e.de>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
jim2101024@...il.com, Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE" <linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/12] dt-bindings: PCI: Cleanup of brcmstb YAML and
add 7712 SoC
On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 2:43 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On 01/08/2024 00:28, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> > o Change order of the compatible strings to be alphabetical
> > o Use "maxItems" where needed.
>
> I asked at v3 and then in v4 about splitting this. You never responded
> to that comment, so sorry I won't be repeating the same thing in v5.
I'm sorry Krzyszof, but I just reviewed your responses in V3 and V4
and I can't find you saying anything about splitting off the above two
bullet points. Perhaps I am somehow losing email responses but all I
see is this in V3 is the following, where you ask me to do a squash,
not a commit:
[JQ] o Change order of the compatible strings to be alphabetical
[]KK] That's a cleanup. You can squash it with a previous patch.
Now you did say in V3
[JQ] o Describe resets/reset-names before using them in rules
[KK] That's a new commit.
but this bullet item does not relate to the bullet points you have
highlighted in this email. As for your responses to V4, I don't see
anything about splitting anything. Again, perhaps I have somehow
missed an email.
Rather than do more round trips of email, can you confirm that this is
what you want:
A new "dt bindings" commit that only includes the changes of
o Change order of the compatible strings to be alphabetical
o Use "maxItems" where needed.
If the above is not what you want, please tell me unequivocally what
you would like changed, even if you think you are repeating yourself.
Regards and thanks,
Jim Quinlan
Broadcom STB/CM
>
> NAK.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4210 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists