[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87v805qs4w.fsf@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 15:43:27 -0700
From: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>
To: "Tomohiro Misono (Fujitsu)" <misono.tomohiro@...itsu.com>
Cc: 'Ankur Arora' <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"catalin.marinas@....com"
<catalin.marinas@....com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com"
<mingo@...hat.com>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"wanpengli@...cent.com"
<wanpengli@...cent.com>,
"vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"daniel.lezcano@...aro.org"
<daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org"
<peterz@...radead.org>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>, "lenb@...nel.org"
<lenb@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"harisokn@...zon.com" <harisokn@...zon.com>,
"mtosatti@...hat.com"
<mtosatti@...hat.com>,
"sudeep.holla@....com" <sudeep.holla@....com>,
"cl@...two.org" <cl@...two.org>,
"joao.m.martins@...cle.com"
<joao.m.martins@...cle.com>,
"boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com"
<boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
"konrad.wilk@...cle.com"
<konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] Enable haltpoll on arm64
Tomohiro Misono (Fujitsu) <misono.tomohiro@...itsu.com> writes:
>> Subject: [PATCH v6 00/10] Enable haltpoll on arm64
>>
>> This patchset enables the cpuidle-haltpoll driver and its namesake
>> governor on arm64. This is specifically interesting for KVM guests by
>> reducing IPC latencies.
>>
>> Comparing idle switching latencies on an arm64 KVM guest with
>> perf bench sched pipe:
>>
>> usecs/op %stdev
>>
>> no haltpoll (baseline) 13.48 +- 5.19%
>> with haltpoll 6.84 +- 22.07%
>
> I got similar results with VM on Grace machine (applied to 6.10).
Great. Thanks for testing.
> [default]
> # cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuidle/current_driver
> none
> # perf bench sched pipe
> # Running 'sched/pipe' benchmark:
> # Executed 1000000 pipe operations between two processes
>
> Total time: 23.832 [sec]
>
> 23.832644 usecs/op
> 41959 ops/sec
>
> [With "cpuidle-haltpoll.force=1" commandline]
> # cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuidle/current_driver
> haltpoll
> # perf bench sched pipe
> # Running 'sched/pipe' benchmark:
> # Executed 1000000 pipe operations between two processes
>
> Total time: 6.340 [sec]
>
> 6.340116 usecs/op
> 157725 ops/sec
>
> Tested-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@...itsu.com>
Thanks!
--
ankur
Powered by blists - more mailing lists