[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <de128e0f41cf98b0379b80fa3adbd3de58a5fd4b.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 07:05:01 +0000
From: CK Hu (胡俊光) <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
To: Mac Shen (沈俊) <Mac.Shen@...iatek.com>,
"chunkuang.hu@...nel.org" <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
Jitao Shi (石记涛) <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>,
"daniel@...ll.ch" <daniel@...ll.ch>, "p.zabel@...gutronix.de"
<p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, "airlied@...il.com" <airlied@...il.com>,
"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
CC: "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Shuijing Li (李水静) <Shuijing.Li@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] Subject: [PATCH] drm/mediatek/dp: Add HDCP2.x
feature for DisplayPort
Hi, Mac:
On Sat, 2024-06-08 at 20:01 +0800, mac.shen wrote:
> Changes in v3:
> - refine the function to get system time
> - refine the flow to do HDCP with content type and
> protection value which set by user space
> - refine the flow to update content protection
> - refine the flow to do HDCP2.x authentication
> per suggestion from the previous thread:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!md6xUiYN88D2YmETs8FQgaExM2zH8S1SmAEU9GRchwpNsXOyDFul3ziVKhRpCJaj8Rcn-gvM-801runjwA$
> /patch/20240205055055.25340-3-mac.shen@...iatek.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: mac.shen <mac.shen@...iatek.com>
> ---
[snip]
> +
> +int dp_tx_hdcp2x_check_link(struct mtk_hdcp_info *hdcp_info)
> +{
> + struct mtk_dp *mtk_dp = container_of(hdcp_info, struct mtk_dp, hdcp_info);
> + u8 rx_status;
> + int ret = -EINVAL;
> + int tmp = 0;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&mtk_dp->hdcp_mutex);
> +
> + if (mtk_dp->hdcp_info.auth_status != AUTH_PASS)
> + goto end;
> +
> + if (!mtk_dp->train_info.cable_plugged_in || !mtk_dp->enabled)
> + goto disable;
> +
> + ret = drm_dp_dpcd_read(&mtk_dp->aux, DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_RXSTATUS_OFFSET, &rx_status,
> + HDCP_2_2_DP_RXSTATUS_LEN);
> + if (ret != HDCP_2_2_DP_RXSTATUS_LEN) {
> + dev_dbg(mtk_dp->dev, "[HDCP2.X] Read bstatus failed, reauth\n");
> + goto disable;
> + }
> +
> + if (HDCP_2_2_DP_RXSTATUS_REAUTH_REQ(rx_status))
> + tmp = REAUTH_REQUEST;
> + else if (HDCP_2_2_DP_RXSTATUS_LINK_FAILED(rx_status))
> + tmp = LINK_INTEGRITY_FAILURE;
> + else if (HDCP_2_2_DP_RXSTATUS_READY(rx_status))
> + tmp = TOPOLOGY_CHANGE;
> +
> + if (tmp == LINK_PROTECTED) {
> + mtk_dp_hdcp_update_value(mtk_dp, DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_ENABLED);
> + ret = 0;
> + goto end;
> + }
> +
> + if (tmp == TOPOLOGY_CHANGE) {
> + ret = dp_tx_hdcp2x_authenticate_repeater(hdcp_info);
> + if (!ret) {
> + mtk_dp_hdcp_update_value(mtk_dp, DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_ENABLED);
> + goto end;
> + }
> + } else {
> + dev_info(mtk_dp->dev, "[HDCP2.X] link failed with:0x%x, retrying auth\n", tmp);
> + }
> +
> +disable:
> + ret = dp_tx_hdcp2x_disabel(hdcp_info);
> + if (ret || !mtk_dp->train_info.cable_plugged_in || !mtk_dp->enabled) {
> + ret = -EAGAIN;
> + mtk_dp_hdcp_update_value(mtk_dp, DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_DESIRED);
> + goto end;
> + }
> +
> + ret = dp_tx_hdcp2x_enable(hdcp_info);
When something error then go here. Why enable hdcp?
Regards,
CK
> + if (ret)
> + mtk_dp_hdcp_update_value(mtk_dp, DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_DESIRED);
> +
> +end:
> + mutex_unlock(&mtk_dp->hdcp_mutex);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
Powered by blists - more mailing lists