[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240812092937.2bd5c85a@xps-13>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 09:29:37 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: "Michael Walle" <michael@...le.cc>
Cc: "Michal Simek" <michal.simek@....com>, "Mahapatra, Amit Kumar"
<amit.kumar-mahapatra@....com>, "Tudor Ambarus" <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>, "pratyush@...nel.org"
<pratyush@...nel.org>, "richard@....at" <richard@....at>, "vigneshr@...com"
<vigneshr@...com>, "sbinding@...nsource.cirrus.com"
<sbinding@...nsource.cirrus.com>, "lee@...nel.org" <lee@...nel.org>,
"james.schulman@...rus.com" <james.schulman@...rus.com>,
"david.rhodes@...rus.com" <david.rhodes@...rus.com>,
"rf@...nsource.cirrus.com" <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>, "perex@...ex.cz"
<perex@...ex.cz>, "tiwai@...e.com" <tiwai@...e.com>,
"linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com" <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
"alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com" <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
"claudiu.beznea@...on.dev" <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "alsa-devel@...a-project.org"
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, "patches@...nsource.cirrus.com"
<patches@...nsource.cirrus.com>, "linux-sound@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-sound@...r.kernel.org>, "git (AMD-Xilinx)" <git@....com>,
"amitrkcian2002@...il.com" <amitrkcian2002@...il.com>, "Conor Dooley"
<conor.dooley@...rochip.com>, "beanhuo@...ron.com" <beanhuo@...ron.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 07/10] mtd: spi-nor: Add stacked memories support in
spi-nor
Hi Michael,
> > > The first round of patches were really invasive regarding the core
> > > code. So if there is a clean layering approach which can be enabled
> > > as a module and you are maintaining it I'm fine with that (even if
> > > the core code needs some changes then like hooks or so, not sure).
> >
> > That discussion started with Miquel some years ago when he was trying to to
> > solve description in DT which is merged for a while in the kernel.
>
> What's your point here? From what I can tell the DT binding is wrong
> and needs to be reworked anyway.
I'm sorry I'm now catching up, can you point at the thread explaining
what is wrong in the bindings? I didn't find where this was detailed. Or
otherwise summarize quickly what needs to change?
Thanks!
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists