[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZrnekeUKciV4eAKC@shikoro>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 12:06:09 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...rry.de>,
Farouk Bouabid <farouk.bouabid@...rry.de>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/8] i2c: muxes: add support for tsd,mule-i2c
multiplexer
> Let's call it real ping, because we have warning in next due to this:
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ti,amc6821.example.dtb: /example-1/i2c/fan@...i2c-mux: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['tsd,mule-i2c-mux']
So someone picked up patches before the dependencies were accepted? Bad
idea.
> Can anyone pick up the i2c pieces?
They need review first. We likely have an issue with resource
availabilty here. It is that simple.
> And/or fix maintainers for your subsystem?
Have you looked at the entries? They look proper to me.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists