linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] drm/ast: astdp: fix loop timeout check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4b5923f3-27c2-4f7f-b3b0-542a62032b64@stanley.mountain>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 11:24:40 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>, Jocelyn Falempe <jfalempe@...hat.com>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/ast: astdp: fix loop timeout check

On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 09:30:00AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> > I feel like if we really hit this failure path then we won't care about the
> > tenth msleep().  I can resend if you want, but I'd prefer to just leave it.
> 
> Please resend. Even if the link training ultimately fails, the rest of DRM
> keeps running. 100 msec is not so short to shrug it off IMHO.
> 

Sure.  No problem.

regards,
dan carpenter