linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/4] locking/rt: Add sparse annotation for RCU.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240812104200.2239232-4-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 12:39:04 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] locking/rt: Add sparse annotation for RCU.

Every lock, that becomes a sleeping on PREEMPT_RT, starts a RCU read
section. There is no sparse annotation for this and sparse complains
about unbalanced locking.

Add __acquires/ __releases for the RCU lock. This covers all but the
trylock functions. I tried the __cond_acquires() annotation but it
didn't work.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
---
 kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c b/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c
index 38e292454fccb..d1cf8b2b6dcac 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static __always_inline void __rt_spin_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
 	migrate_disable();
 }
 
-void __sched rt_spin_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
+void __sched rt_spin_lock(spinlock_t *lock) __acquires(RCU)
 {
 	spin_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
 	__rt_spin_lock(lock);
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ void __sched rt_spin_lock_nest_lock(spinlock_t *lock,
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_spin_lock_nest_lock);
 #endif
 
-void __sched rt_spin_unlock(spinlock_t *lock)
+void __sched rt_spin_unlock(spinlock_t *lock) __releases(RCU)
 {
 	spin_release(&lock->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
 	migrate_enable();
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ int __sched rt_write_trylock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_write_trylock);
 
-void __sched rt_read_lock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
+void __sched rt_read_lock(rwlock_t *rwlock) __acquires(RCU)
 {
 	rtlock_might_resched();
 	rwlock_acquire_read(&rwlock->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ void __sched rt_read_lock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_read_lock);
 
-void __sched rt_write_lock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
+void __sched rt_write_lock(rwlock_t *rwlock) __acquires(RCU)
 {
 	rtlock_might_resched();
 	rwlock_acquire(&rwlock->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ void __sched rt_write_lock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_write_lock);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
-void __sched rt_write_lock_nested(rwlock_t *rwlock, int subclass)
+void __sched rt_write_lock_nested(rwlock_t *rwlock, int subclass) __acquires(RCU)
 {
 	rtlock_might_resched();
 	rwlock_acquire(&rwlock->dep_map, subclass, 0, _RET_IP_);
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ void __sched rt_write_lock_nested(rwlock_t *rwlock, int subclass)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_write_lock_nested);
 #endif
 
-void __sched rt_read_unlock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
+void __sched rt_read_unlock(rwlock_t *rwlock) __releases(RCU)
 {
 	rwlock_release(&rwlock->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
 	migrate_enable();
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ void __sched rt_read_unlock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_read_unlock);
 
-void __sched rt_write_unlock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
+void __sched rt_write_unlock(rwlock_t *rwlock) __releases(RCU)
 {
 	rwlock_release(&rwlock->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
 	rcu_read_unlock();
-- 
2.45.2