[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240812105326.2240000-3-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 12:51:05 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] hrtimer: Annotate hrtimer_cpu_base_.*_expiry() for sparse.
The two hrtimer_cpu_base_.*_expiry() functions are wrapper around the
locking functions and sparse complains about the missing counterpart.
Add sparse annotation to denote that this bevaviour is expected.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
---
kernel/time/hrtimer.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
index b8ee320208d41..f56ef23aad903 100644
--- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
@@ -1351,11 +1351,13 @@ static void hrtimer_cpu_base_init_expiry_lock(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *base)
}
static void hrtimer_cpu_base_lock_expiry(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *base)
+ __acquires(&base->softirq_expiry_lock)
{
spin_lock(&base->softirq_expiry_lock);
}
static void hrtimer_cpu_base_unlock_expiry(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *base)
+ __releases(&base->softirq_expiry_lock)
{
spin_unlock(&base->softirq_expiry_lock);
}
--
2.45.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists